RE: Downvote Control Tool Proposal, smarter downvotes, more options and more !

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Downvote Control Tool Proposal, smarter downvotes, more options and more !

in downvotes •  5 years ago 

If you believe in "proof of brain", then when you downvote, you should use the minimal amount of SP possible. Otherwise, "proof of brain" is non-sense. 99% of the folks voted positively, meaning the "proof of brain" was revealing a favorable outcome to the post. Regardless of how you felt about it. When you use your full SP, your making POB irrelevant. You reduce it to "Proof of Steem Power"

So if your a true believer of POB, then stop using your full SP when down-voting and only use the smallest unit possible. Otherwise, your just a hypocrite.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  5 years ago (edited)

Your argumentation makes no sense. Votes are stake weighted, not on a per vote basis. And if I use minimal power how can I reallocate rewards that shouldn't go on bad content ?

I'll make it simple. Which of these options resembles "Proof of Brain"?

A) 1000 people upvote a post and 1 person downvotes. Creator gets 99.9999% of his/her due rewards.

B) 1000 people upvote a post and 1 person downvotes. Creator gets zero rewards due to the one downvote having a greator voice than the 1000.