What do you think about @burnpost & @sbdpotato

in dpoll •  5 years ago 

What do you think about @burnpost & @sbdpotato


Lately these two posts are receiving an increased post value. Since they appear more and more onto the trending page, the discussions have heated. Is it good for the token economy? Is it bad?

Which front is stronger?

Let me know what you think!


  • It's great. I believe in the promise. [++]

  • Could be working [+]

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

  • I don't like it. Messes up the trending page [-]

  • Votes don't get distributed and they destroy the economy [--]

Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Voted for

  • It's great. I believe in the promise. [++]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

I know about @burnpost, which may be good in my opinion, but I do not about @sbdpotato. This is the first time I hear about it.

Voted for

  • Votes don't get distributed and they destroy the economy [--]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

Voted for

  • Could be working [+]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

I have no idea what you are talking about. I never read what is on trending.

Voted for

  • Could be working [+]

!trdo

Congratulations @vimukthi, you successfuly trended the post shared by @clm!
@clm will receive 0.08544488 TRDO & @vimukthi will get 0.05696325 TRDO curation in 3 Days from Post Created Date!

"Call TRDO, Your Comment Worth Something!"

To view or trade TRDO go to steem-engine.com
Join TRDO Discord Channel or Join TRDO Web Site

Congratulations @clm, your post successfully recieved 0.37783463 TRDO from below listed TRENDO callers:

@vimukthi earned : 0.05696325 TRDO curation
@d-zero earned : 0.1949265 TRDO curation


To view or trade TRDO go to steem-engine.com
Join TRDO Discord Channel or Join TRDO Web Site

Voted for

  • Could be working [+]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

Voted for

  • Could be working [+]

!trdo

Congratulations @d-zero, you successfuly trended the post shared by @clm!
@clm will receive 0.29238975 TRDO & @d-zero will get 0.19492650 TRDO curation in 3 Days from Post Created Date!

"Call TRDO, Your Comment Worth Something!"

To view or trade TRDO go to steem-engine.com
Join TRDO Discord Channel or Join TRDO Web Site

Voted for

  • Could be working [+]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]

Voted for

  • Haven't made my mind up [o]
  ·  5 years ago Reveal Comment

What's you deal downvoting posts that reward flags against spam? I would advise not doing that.

Unless you are into your investment losing value. Whether you acknowledge it or not, we are doing you a service.

Please, try to let go of the past. It's not profitable to hold onto things like that and I hear holding grudges is bad for your health.

Peace ✌️

Lol why bother? He's just gonna recite the same bs about "eye for an eye".

Unless you are into your investment losing value.

Better check out what he is delegating to.

Plz follow me

Please, don't beg for follows. It's unbecoming and will likely subject you to downvotes.

Create compelling content and being genuine is how you earn followers. Will check back on your progress.

I don't like their multiple standards. They downvote bots, bought upvotes. But they themselves post machine generated shit posts, and upvote those shit. I despise that fucking behavior. The value of their post is too high. I downvote to neutralize them, and I hope you can join us☺

The value of their post is too high.

Not really if you properly appraise the risk of engaging in negative curation against bad actors. Those posts set such individuals as beneficiaries. The way I see, if anything they are undervalued. The rewards are well earned for the activity and energy committed to the chain.

But you're entitled to your opinion however unfair it is. It's easy to generalize people and miss the forest for the trees. I think such is your error.

Your thought is too rough. You value people by what one did, not by each posts they write. It's like if a good man rape your wife, you still appraise it's good, cause the other things he did is good grossly.
That's not how law works. People should be judge by each behavior(or a sequence if they're associated)