Why drone strikes and acceptable collateral damage doctrine was introduced...

in dronewars •  6 years ago 

dear people living in target area...

I can't imagine your suffering and the injustice you experienced.

However this is what I can tell you,

I would have prefer that it wasn't necessary. because I made a simple calculation, the live of the troops, even the worst of them all (and they are statistically bad elements ;)) was worth your entire village, town, city, country, continent.

I would have prefered to be able to have something peaceful... or relatively low intensity. but you let your neighbors use IEDs, you let them use snipers, you didn't rat them out... for example in the case of afghanistan and the taliban, it's nice and beautiful to say no to the extradition of ussama... I mean it's normal, according to your book he did nothing wrong, but look one second from the other side...

he was accused of pulling down 2 skyscrapers (it's not important if it's him or not), you could have agreed to give him... but no.

then you could have agreed to patrols and co, but no

so then once the new strategy is deployed following your actions, there is no reason to whine... and just to be clear, it's way way way close to the bottom in the scaling...

troops came in humvees and by foot, you killed them, drones came from the sky, and those who killed them were killed with some around them... it's war.

and let me assure you it's really sad... it could be else...

but first what everyone wants? anyway...

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

This user is on the @buildawhale blacklist for one or more of the following reasons:

  • Spam
  • Plagiarism
  • Scam or Fraud