Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

When evaluating some of these so-called shoe prints, we should be careful that we are not experiencing some form of pareidolia. In the case of the Fisher Canyon shoe print, the archaeologist you quote, Hubbard, seems to be unreliable in that he claimed a piece of artwork carved in 1917 was actually a fossilized human. His ability to evaluate evidence is highly questionable. Also, the claim that humans couldn't produce such a shoe, which resembles a basic moccasin, in 1917, is rather silly, as shoes in general are ancient technology.

Congratulations @amunra! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of posts published

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!