RE: Serial Child Sex Abuser Roy Moore Loses in ALABAMA!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Serial Child Sex Abuser Roy Moore Loses in ALABAMA!

in dtube •  7 years ago 

could be an interesting christmas if he decideds to do a recount. Do you think he will?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The decision to recount is not his to make. If it was less than 0.5%, then a recount would be automatic. I think his spread was more like 1.5%. With that number, a recount is not likely.

The recount statute does not include US Senators as races for which a recount can be requested, even at the expense of the defeated candidate: https://electionlawblog.org/?p=96376.

So what you are saying is that there will be no recount. Correct?

Really I thought it was if he had the money he could just do it okay that is interesting.

I checked into it a bit more. I think that you are correct that if Moore can get someone to pay for it then it can be done. But the problem is with statistics and probabilities. With a 1.5% loss, it is just very unlikely that a recount would change the result. So, I stand corrected. As I said, if a race is within half a percentage point after all the votes are tallied, an automatic recount is triggered. But a recount will probably have no effect if the lead is 1.5%. Again, anyone who knows more about this, please add your comments.

Here is an article about it - "Why Roy Moore’s hope for a recount is a very long long shot":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/12/13/why-roy-moores-hope-for-a-recount-is-a-very-long-long-shot/?utm_term=.35739860452c

I am not 100% sure. But I think so. Hope others add comments to clarify this if I am wrong.