Yes I made the mistake in believing you understood the word Utopian since you used it. This is what I responded to. Everything I said was in context to what you said. You not being able to see the context really is not something I can control. That's on you. If you don't want people to respond to what YOU write then don't write.
RE: How to unite Americans once and for all!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How to unite Americans once and for all!
Utopian: modeled on or aiming for a state in which everything is perfect; idealistic.
It was used in perfect context. It was in reference to the sentiment 'all americans will be united for once' which assumes a state of perfect harmony between every person. You brought up ideology out of the blue. My original post was about a single sentiment, not an ideology. The problem here is your lack of reading comprehension. Try again without deflecting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Man you are projecting so much it is not even funny. It's pretty sad. You seriously need to look in a mirror, or perhaps go read what you wrote. Then reread what I wrote in response to you. Then you responded with some pretty nutty things and insults to that. Your inability to speak with civility and need to resort to belittling, insults, and ad hominems hurts your argument more than anything I can say to you. Keep it up. A lot of people on steemit see past that type of thing. hands @chirieleison a shovel
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Lol more deflection. I like how you responded to one sentence of my response, and it's the most inconsequential sentence there. I could have left that out, and it wouldn't have made a difference. It shows how truly desparate you are to keep your ego afloat. Keep grasping at straws.
What I said in my original post is actually very simple to understand. I called the sentiment 'all americans will be united for once' utopian, which it is by definition. There was no mention of ideology or any other political beliefs until you brought it up. It wasn't an argument, just an observation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You really do not understand words do you. I have not done a single incident of deflection. In fact the closest to an example of deflection is when you replied to my second response saying I was taking it out of context as you were replying to the title of the blog post. Yet you clearly responded to me. That is deflection. So once again you are projecting. You are attempting to push your own flaws onto me. It doesn't work. Go back and read it carefully. I didn't go out of context once. Furthermore sharing a dictionary definition (aka Appeal to Authority) in a later response does not prove you actually knew what you were talking about initially. I'll give you that if you didn't know what you were talking about then my initial reply to you might indeed seem to make no sense. If you actually know what Utopia means then my response should be clear. Furthermore, you are the one who keeps referring to me speaking about ideologies. That is in fact deflection. So what? Utopia itself is an ideological concept so speaking of ideologies is relevant. Your insistence of latching onto that is actually a good example of deflection. So once again you are projecting. Get a mirror.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes it was simple. So was my response which was not an argument. It was simply my observation that pretty much all ideologies and concepts tend to be utopian in nature. They all sound really good and attainable, but in practice it doesn't actually happen. Which is why I also shared the view that Utopia itself is a lot like infinity but is applied to ideologies rather than numbers. That was an observation. It was not an attack.
You are the one that then decided to indicate I was retarded and come out with other belittling and uncivil responses. I still haven't called you an idiot yet. I may have thought it a few times, but I kept myself in check as I am giving you the benefit of the doubt and calling you an idiot from a very brief exchange would be rather idiotic of me. So I didn't do it. I actually don't think you are an idiot.
I do think you are one of those that likes to nit pick and look for things to attack. That seems to be the case from your initial response to the blog, and your subsequent replies to me. Your insistence to attack and belittle doesn't make you look superior it also doesn't do a damn thing to convince the person you speak to that you are right. Insults and belittling are a sign of weakness. I don't actually think you are weak either. I think you simply have some bad habits and I won't bow down to you and ignore them initially. I'll point them out. See if you check yourself and choose to be civil rather than a weak name caller. We all make mistakes.
You made an observation to the original blog.
I made an observation related to the words in your observation. It was relevant. It was in context. It was not an attack. It was simply something I thought is kind of interesting. Utopia and Utopian are interesting words and they evoke some interesting thoughts. Everything I said to you was relevant, and in context. I have not once deflected.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit