It is sec related.
Controlling who gets rewards makes steem a security, or some such.
Stinc should give the blockchain its steem and let the witness supermajority downvote abuse, but that might cause steem to live up to its potential.
I think stinc decided to burn this to the ground just before booting dan.
Consider your sources.
If that's the reason, it should be screamed from the mountaintops. At least that way people would know they're not just negligent beyond all measure.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, there are many moving parts in steem.
I was told by somebody that walks softly, but has big credibility.
It's harder playing this as a guessing game, but it does stretch out the entertainment.
When this is where a marketing expert ceo leads us maybe it's better not to know the full truth.
At 800k steem a month they will be gone soon enough.
They can only sell it once.
Let's hope good actors buy it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit