Trump supporters abandoning him in DROVES! (Part 2)

in dtube •  7 years ago 


Msm, as is typically the case, is currently CREATING NARRATIVE rather than what they should be doing, objectively reporting the news. Their so-called 'reporting' on the Alabama election and it's effects on Trump's support base is actually fantasy stories & commentary on what msm 'wants' to be the case, not what 'is' the case. It is so obvious to Trumpsters yet seems to be completely out of anti-Trumpster's cognative comprehension. As anti-Trumpers salivate and applaud watching their fake news malign this new Populist movement as if it were objective reporting, Trumpsters simply get angrier at the insults & lies and become more determined to take the political & msm establishment down. As was illustrated by electing a Trumpster to the Senate as opposed to his establishment opponent.

If you want to know what's 'really going on in America you need to listen to Rush Limbaugh, the radio host msm & the political Left hates/misrepresents the most. Maybe someday they'll wake up to the fact that media outlets are no longer able to control the masses via creating narrative. But I wouldn't hold my breath. They still have massive control over the useful idiots of the Left.

Link to Part 1 of this series https://dtube.video/#!/v/julzee/c193myal
Image source: http://www.peacemonger.org/CS242--Love-Trumps-Hate--Anti-Trump-Color-Sticker_p_3946.html


► Watch on DTube
► Watch Source (IPFS)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Both strange and moore are repubs. How would either outcome help the left?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Because Strange is 'establishment' Republican and Moore Trumpist Republican. We've had enough of the establishment (RINOs Republican in name only). We're 'fundamentally transforming' the Republican Party to be as establishment-free as possible. Democrats have successfully fundamentally transformed their Party into almost exclusive establishment. It's a shame too because the ordinary Democrat voters 'should' have formed their own Tea Party movement (which has now morphed into the Trumpist movement) and worked to drain their swamp. I think some thought Bernie Sanders was the beginning of their Tea Party but it was a false alarm.

You throw these terms around as if they mean something. I see no difference between the so called establishment repubs and the trump movement. The repubs were powerless for 8 years and now that they control all 3 branches of government, they have done nothing except prove their own incompetence. If there are such differences would you care to elaborate?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Yes. You're too eager for results.. The Trump movement is in the 'process' of replacing our Republican establishment. We can't do anything about the Democratic establishment because the establishment won't put forth an anti-establishment candidate and the Democrat voters won't do what we did by electing a Trump. A non-establishment, non-politician with enough balls to drain their side of the swamp candidate. I think some felt Bernie Sanders to be theirr Trump but it was a false alarm. #1 he turns out to be establishment. #2 the once classical Liberals are no longer Democrats. They now define themselves as Independents or red-pilled it over to Trump. So, bottom line, Democrat/Republican no longer matters. They're all a part of the same establishment. It's now a battle between estab/non-estab regardless of what Party but Trumpsters are the only voters waging the war on the swamp. Ergo, Strange would have added one more swamp creature. Make sense now?

You wrote an entire paragraph without defining what you mean by establishment and anti-establishment. You could have writen it in Swahalli and it would have made about as much sense to me.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Oh sorry. Establishment is the elite political class. The politicians who create laws/policies based on donors' wants and desires $$ and become millionaires themselve through these connections or based on their own personal ideologies rather than looking to the Constitution. Establishment people usually use the narrative that our Constitution is flawed as justification. Example would be like how Obama describes how he views our Constitution. He said something like the flaw is that it contains negative rights (what the government 'can't' do) as opposed to what the government 'can' do. But it's obvious to me that this highly intellegent 'scholar of the Constitution' allows too much of his own Socialist/anti-Colonialist bias to taint his view of the actual purpose & intent of why the Constitution was precisely purposely written that way for a reason. I'll elaborate tomorrow night if I can. Have to get sleep now for busy day tomorrow. I enjoy our talks...:)

If that is the case why did Trump appoint Goldman Sachs insiders to key positions in his cabinet, the same kind of people that robbed americans with the 2008 investment bank bailouts. Is Trump in favor of robbery when it suits his interest?

There's also nothing wrong with being anti-colonial. The revolution that created this very nation was 'anti-colonial' in nature. Colonialism is government robbery on a massive scale.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Well I think Britain thought there was something wrong with it...lol And yes I think there is definitely something wrong with thinking that America is Colonialist. Don't you? If you're going to attempt to 'fundamentally transform' our Nation ILLEGALLY like Obama did then fuck yes there's something wrong with his view of America.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I'm not sure why Trump is surrounding himself with certain people? Personally I don't like all the generals he's got so close. But at the same time I'm looking at his 'actions' and so far everything I see him 'doing' is giving State power back that the Fed took so.. Idk you tell me?

I don't think Trump is an ideologue. I think he picks people who he believes possess the talent to achieve his goals. I honestly don't think he thinks much about who they are. Just as long as they do what he says and don't cross him, or do anything to tarnish his business character or his trust. Loyalty is HUGE with Trump.

The establishment includes mainstream media who covers for Democrat corruption at all costs downplaying theirs while highlighting and even manufacturing Trumps as is seen with the Russia collusion narrative. American establishment is tied to other Countries' establishments. Together they make up the globalists. The goal is to centralize power. The global warming scam is just one example. Through co2 laws/regulations the elite get thrir carbon credits and spew as much as they want but we the little folk do with less. Power over the people.

Is it concievable to you that the 'establishment' is not a monolith, but includes competing interests, just as the aristocrats of old had competing interests.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

The American establishment is tied to establishments from just about every Country in the World. It's globalists imo. A freegin massive web of elites concerned with enriching themselves. So yeah, seemingly variable & competing on the surface interests. But the end game is all the same. Their spot within the power structure.