Trump supporters abandoning him in DROVES! (Part 1)

in dtube •  7 years ago 


Trump supporters in Alabama last night, by voting AGAINST Trump's endorsement of Luther Strange to take over Jeff Session's vacant Senate seat, signaled the first real crack in Trump's base. Until now Trump has had unwavering, solid support from his Conservative base. But this showing of 'defiance' against him means trouble in the Republican Party's future.

Lol...This is what you think if you are msm, or watch msm for your news. But you would be wildly mistaken. Rush Limbaugh's genius take on this issue is SPOT ON! Msm reports on current events, as usual, through their lense of what 'should' be..what they 'hope' is..rather than what truely is.

Listen if you're interested in knowing what this Alabama vote REALLY meant. And it's a doozey. The American movement of 'Trumpism' is even bigger than Trump himself.

Image source: http://www.peacemonger.org/CS242--Love-Trumps-Hate--Anti-Trump-Color-Sticker_p_3946.html


► Watch on DTube
► Watch Source (IPFS)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

dumb and wrong

What's dumb & wrong? Rush or the media?

It's a sign of two good things

First, as you say

The American movement of 'Trumpism' is even bigger than Trump himself.

Second, that we aren't cultists like obalblah or hillary shills who go apeshit over the smallest criticism of their Dear Leaders

I agree

Where does the Trumpist movement stand on economic freedom and civil liberties?

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

My interpretation of the Trump movement is, as far as economic freedom, is as little regulation as possible. Especially Federal regulation. Capitalism, warts and all, and mind you I'm not talking 'unfettered' Capitalism and particularly not crony capitalism, is the best way to growth and prosperity. As far as civil liberties I would say as I stated elsewhere in our conversations, that States have all power to decide individual liberties in their own States excluding what are invested 'by the Constitution' as the Fed's responsibility.

So for instance where does he stand on Occupational licensing and civil asset forfeiture?

Who Trump? Not sure. But what does that have to do with the Trump movement? Or in what I'm assuming you have as a better idea than our Constitution..? Because I get the impression that you either believe there to be a better way to run our Country...? I'm still confused as to where you're even coming from. I get the feeling you believe in a better way to run the Country other than our current structure but you aren't coming out and saying what.

Yes, there is a better system for running the country than fractional reserve banking and corporatism.

The Constitution also has flaws. For instance it gives the federal government a monopoly over parcel service when this could be done by private enterprise. It also authroizes a personal income tax through the 16th amendment. I am not suggesting replacement but reform.

But you must be aware that occupational licensing is an economic freedom issue and civil asset forfeiture is a civil liberty issue though they are practically inseparable since they both hurt small businesses.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I don't agree with the central bank either. But whatever specific 'reform' you talk about does not mean the Constitution has 'flaws'. It can be changed through the amendendment process. Any other way to change, I and half the Country would adamently oppose it. No matter how noble the cause. That's our entire beef with the Left! They institute their agendas (which they feel is 'fixing our Constitutional flaws') illegally. The Constitution imo has no flaws. It is the perfect document with processes for correction with anything this Country might feel needs added/subtracted. What's flawed is people who refuse to abide by it. Do you see it differently?

Btw, monopoly over parcel service doesn't stop ups/fedex's to exist.

The constitution as it currently stands is flawed. Even the original constitution was flawed since it did not explicitly prohibit slavery. That being said the constituion was inspired by ideals that are morally perfect, and thus it has the potential to become a perfect document. What is lacking is national character.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I totally agree with the lacking National character point. But you just proved by your own reply how that document 'is' perfect. Because we were able to amend it to correct an error in our Society makes it the perfect document able to cure (at least as humanly possible) ANY issue this Country faces. When I say perfect document I don't mean that it has a magic ability to cure all ills. But it's the best document known to mankind, which for sure NEEDS an educated citizenry wise enough to PROTECT it, able to secure frredom from tyranny. Without the National character we will become eventually, Venezuala. So the document itself is nothing but a piece of paper. It's the mindset of the Country who cherishes it that enables it's power against tyranny. Ergo the outrage at the NFL kneely bullshit. To believe that disrespecting the flag/anthem is valid protest against some particular oppression would have people like me having kneeled for at least the past 8 years. But I don't blame my Country for the oppression of Obamacare or other overreaches. I blame an ignorant citizenry.