RE: Why do Peter Mckinnon & Casey Neistat use the 16-35mm vs 24mm 1.4 L ? [16-35mm 2.8 vs 24mm 1.4 for Vlogging]

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Why do Peter Mckinnon & Casey Neistat use the 16-35mm vs 24mm 1.4 L ? [16-35mm 2.8 vs 24mm 1.4 for Vlogging]

in dtube •  5 years ago 

Awesome Job, Vince. That was really thorough. Personally, I think the 16-35mm gives that classic YouTube aesthetic that we're used to seeing with popular vloggers in the film/photography space which grants the viewer a surreal and pleasant watching experience. It makes the world feel more exaggerated and magical opposed to the 24 which feels more like a realistic, even with a shallower depth of field.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!