~~~~~~~[]=¤ԅ(ˊᗜˋ* )੭ Why Axioms Are Important
7 years ago by shayne (68)
$33.52
- Past Payouts $33.52
- - Author $24.36
- - Curators $9.16
33 votes
- + acidyo: $21.904 (25%)
- + wackou: $8.444 (15%)
- + pharesim: $0.657 (0.5%)
- + ausbitbank: $0.622 (1%)
- + barrydutton: $0.438 (15%)
- + personz: $0.236 (100%)
- + fulltimegeek: $0.235 (100%)
- + ausbitbot: $0.132 (100%)
- + shayne: $0.103 (100%)
- + ma1neevent: $0.097 (12.5%)
- + lenatramper: $0.080 (25%)
- + ancapwarren: $0.079 (50%)
- + uruiamme: $0.075 (100%)
- + sebastianjago: $0.067 (5%)
- + jcoins79: $0.056 (100%)
- + lazzelazer: $0.055 (100%)
- + arsenal49: $0.049 (5%)
- + decentralizd: $0.041 (2.5%)
- + robertvogt: $0.039 (20%)
- + triverse: $0.033 (25%)
- … and 13 more
it's interesting Axiomatic Logic, I like philosophy, thanks sharing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think a lot of people like you say are missing their base.
I would say Axioms are Foundational Truths or Knowledge.
Missing this stuff means by and large the current statism dilutes or filters a lot of this out of curriculum on purpose.
It dumbs people down as you know, they then can be kept in line easier by the state, who seek to control the people this way and then conform them to be puppets and order followers.
I know you know but others might not.
Thanks for stopping by my posts here and there man, it is always nice to hear from you and I always notice Shayne.
Have a good week.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the term "Axiomatic Logic" is kind of confusing and misleading. I prefer Rand's original "Axiomatic Concept":
I agree with you that "relativism" is pretty problematic (especially the moral variety, you focus on the epistemological variety though) and has a lot of people confused. Your example argument, that the complete rejection of the concept of an absolute is an absolute statement, is a good one but it misses the point of the problem of a posteriori reasoning, reasoning by observation, which is that the universe imperfectly matches our observations, models and understanding. Or in other words, it's very different to say you agree there are absolutes but that it is hard to determine what they are, and to say there is no absolute.
So it's fine to say, this orange weighs 3 ounces, but that is highly probably to be not absolutely true. However that discrepancy really doesn't matter at all in this case. In others it can.
I know that a lot of people get incorrectly branded as relativists for being skeptics. I am one of those people. So I would say that I doubt you know the actual weight of that orange, but I don't deny that it has an actual weight, and I don't doubt that you can know it satisfactorily well, and more importantly usefully well. In the case of the orange anyway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit