WRONG-DOINGS
Many of the wrong behaviors we can witness today. Murder; Assault, Rape, Theft, Trespass and Coercion are initiations of aggressive behavior and violence. These actions are VIOLATIONS against NATURAL RIGHTS, and therefor constitute violence. And you can contemplate any wrong-doing you want on the face of the earth and you will recognize that any single wrong behavior you can think up is all based on theft. There is only one wrong on the planet, and it's all theft in one form or another, and there is only one law in the universe, and that's, “Don't Steal.” And, that's it. Every wrong-doing comes down to an act of theft.
Murder; is taking without the just cause of another’s life, which does NOT belong to you.
Assault; is taking without just cause of another’s physical well-being, which does NOT belong to you.
Rape; is taking another’s sexual free-will away without consent, which does NOT belong to you.
Theft itself, is taking property, which does NOT belong to you.
Trespass is taking another’s security by being in their dwelling place, which does NOT belong to you.
And Coercion, is taking the free-will of another’s, which does NOT belong to you.
Every wrong-doing is a form of theft, and there's no other wrong-doing that you can think of that is not a form of theft.
NATURAL LAW VS. MANS LAW
Natural law is based upon principles & truth, which are inherent to Creation, where man's laws are based upon dogmatic belief, which are constructed by a diseased mind. Natural law is only harmonized due to knowledge and understanding or not harmonized due to ignorance, while man’s laws are only complied due to fear of punishment or retaliation.
Natural law is universal; and it exists and applies anywhere in the universe, regardless of the location, while man’s laws differ from one individual to the next, differs with location based upon the whims of legislators who are making up these decree's and commands. This is also a form of moral relativism, which is the idea that we can decide what is right and wrong and are not objective or inherent to creation because they are based on actions.
The Difference Between Natural Law and Man’s Law
Natural Law is Eternal and Immutable, it exists and applies for as long as the Universe exists, and it cannot be changed or tampered with, while man’s law on the other hand changes with time and placement, based upon the whims of legislators which is also the idea of “Moral Relativism.”
If a man-made law is in harmony with natural law, it follows logically that it’s redundant, since it’s stating a Truth that is inherent, or pre-existing, eternal and self-evident or it should be self-evident… Therefor it is both irrelevant and unnecessary.
If a man-made law is in Opposition to Natural Law, it follows logically that it is both False (Incorrect) and Immoral (Harmful), or in other words, just plain old WRONG. Therefor it CANNOT be legitimately binding upon anyone. The fact is that we don't need man’s coercive laws and created laws and only need to come into compliance with natural law. And that’s it! Then, and only then will we get to experience a society that is accurately based in freedom. Because, as we engage in a moral behaved society, society itself becomes more free and as we keep engaging in immoral behaviors, that society becomes more enslaved. There's a law that governs the whole society. As morality increases, freedom increases. As morality declines, freedom declines.
“There is only one true divide in humanity”
That is what belief in authority is; it’s the belief in the legitimacy of Slavery.
Just like that of a right wing /left wing paradigm, or democratic /republican belief, the only two REAL differences of types of individuals is whether they are a statist or an anarchist. I'm not talking about people and their personalities, but I'm talking about what separates us into two distinct camps of sentient beings.
A Statist has the belief through the brilliant idea that we give a small group of people the right to kidnap, imprison, harass or steal from an individual, or even harness the idea that it's legitimate to kill certain types of people while at the same time we are being forced to believe we are “protected” from the same types of people who also kidnap, harass, steal and kill people. So, the statist, in my opinion, is a complete and utter failure and a disgrace to humanity. I mean, it's just brilliant ideology, don't you think? It's working out so well for humanity, don't you think? Our rights are protected, we're prosperous and free people, right? It's a flawless idea that's been working out so wonderfully! Or has it?
Jesus was an anarchist and didn't follow the laws of the land and spoke out against taking whatever they were offering you, including saying to give back to Caesar what is Caesars. What is he talking about there? He's talking about their fake currency, and fake money. The monetary system in it of itself is a fraud over mankind and many of Christs followers are not anarchists, instead they are statists because no one wants to step on anyone's toes these days for fear of retaliation or fear of imprisonment, or both. Today, you can speak out about anything TRUTHFUL, or at least something that is near and dear to your heart and can be silenced for doing so. This is the major flaw in our system, when it acts as though it's out to serve and protect your interests when it's not servicing you, nor protecting your interests at all. At ALL! The truth is that there is many fake ass Christians who all believe in the authority of government yet have this notion in their minds that somehow God can be the authority and bringing in the laws that govern humanity and yet, we can still find legitimacy to the authority that is invested in man. This is the idea of serving two masters.
"THE STATIST"
A Statist is an individual who erroneously believes that there is such a thing as “Authority” vested in certain human beings, which magically gives them the power and “the right to rule” over other people. This “Authority” means that certain people, who we call “Government,” (Masters) have the “moral right” to issue commands to those whom they rule, and those under their jurisdiction – which in its etymological roots simply means, the law is what I say it is – (Slaves) have a “moral obligation” to obey the arbitrary dictates (“laws”) set by their Masters. Most simply put, when you remove all the euphemisms that protect this idea, a Statist is someone who believes in the legitimacy of SLAVERY, even though most and many men know that SLAVERY is wrong, and not a valid way to force upon ANY other individual, and yet – we protect it out of fear of death or retaliation for speaking out against it. (The legitimacy of the Statist, by definition, makes a lot of people immoral here on earth.)
The problem is that people don't understand the true meaning of anarchy. I'm not talking about people who “call” themselves anarchists here, I am talking about the true anarchist and those who are true anarchists are speaking out against the powers that are invested into these laws that create the kind of Slavery that we still see going on today. The only real answer to tell people what a true anarchist is, is someone that doesn't believe in the legitimacy of Authority, when it outrightly legitimizes the behavior of Slavery. The truest answers are those who are invested in moral behavior with Natural Law and who stick up for the moral obligation to speak out on such terms.
IT MEANS NO SLAVES and NO MASTERS. From the Greek prefix “an-” meaning without; or the absence of” and the Greek noun (-archon) meaning “master, or ruler.”
NO MASTERS AND NO RULERS
Anarchy does NOT mean “without rules.” It does NOT mean chaos or without order as they like to call it. It does not mean lawlessness, when it comes to MORAL LAW. It literally translates into You or a People “without rulers, and without masters.”
To Read Further on this blog series, please ClickHere and thanks for your dedication to help get an uncensored online discussion started. Please Leave some comments along the way and don't forget to upvote.
SOURCE:clickhere