The founding Fathers knew that government is a parasite, which is why they limited the government using the Constitution!

The founding fathers are the ones that created land grants/warrants and doled them out as political favors among themselves and people that aided the war of independence, no different really from monarchs bestowing estates on nobles in the ancien regime minus the titles of nobility, extinguished aboriginal title over the same lands by assuming a religious doctrine that Pope Alexander VI declared three centuries earlier as case law that is still in effect btw, and seized them at bayonet point from the nations inhabiting them even when they had treaties with said nations. Was the Northwest ordinance too much government control over land? How about moving the nation's capitol to an undeveloped swampland between Virginia and Maryland that Washington personally profited from as a landowner of some of the tracts? How about the Louisiana purchase? The acquisition of Florida, Alaska, Hawaii? The treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo? The Homestead Act of 1862 or the Morrill Land Grant Act? How about the Transpacific Railroad that required not only land grants and eminent domain takings but also congressional financing? Its fine to pretend the government was small in the distant past which makes sense when its overseeing an agrarian economy of mainly subsistence farmers with nothing but frontier land beyond. However, there was no time in history, including U.S. history, where the government didn't control land and decide not only who was entitled to it but how it was going to be used (even before zoning was a thing). Sure 19th century congress didn't plan the economy like a soviet gosplan but deciding where railroads, highways and canals would be built did plan where future generations of business would occur and where it wouldn't. The thing you claim to fear is not only the present reality its also been reality for the entire history of the country. Realty titles are and have always been creatures of the state no different from patents, trademarks, or articles of incorporation and suggesting their value should remunerate the public that makes them valuable in the first place is not government overreach.