“Financial deplatforming, or banking censorship, will be a common lever governments and companies reach for when it comes to censorship of political opinions."
Personally, I don't know if Russell Brand is guilty of what he is accused of or not. But that's not really the point. Or rather it IS the point depending on how you look at it.
The point is that (at least in America) you are supposed to be considered innocent until PROVEN guilty. An accusation of a crime is not enough to convict. However, corporations wield such control as to, for most practical purposes, convict you before a trial even begins. While for someone as wealthy as Russell Brand, perhaps the consequences of what YouTube did is no big deal. But imagine for someone who counts on such income for their livelihood.
I know there are those that for some reason believe the supposed victim is always telling the truth but this is obviously not the case. Even if it is the case 99% of the time, 99% is not 100%. For one recent example, look at accusations Amber Heard made against Johnny Depp. As a result of those accusation, Disney dropped Depp. Yet it turned out that those accusations were dubious at best. Depp in fact won a defamation lawsuit.
I'm not suggesting accusations of abuse should not be taken seriously. Obviously, they must be. However, can we not go back to the ideal of "innocent until proven guilt?" Is that so unreasonable? What's not reasonable is the ability of someone to destroy someone else's life or career simply by accusing them of something. What's even more disturbing is that this sort of financial censorship happens for things as benign as political opinions. Toe the line or live on the streets I guess.
Thank you, friend!
I'm @steem.history, who is steem witness.
Thank you for witnessvoting for me.
please click it!
(Go to https://steemit.com/~witnesses and type fbslo at the bottom of the page)
The weight is reduced because of the lack of Voting Power. If you vote for me as a witness, you can get my little vote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations, your post has been upvoted by @upex with a 0.26% upvote. We invite you to continue producing quality content and join our Discord community here. Visit https://botsteem.com to utilize usefull and productive automations #bottosteem #upex
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's true that censorship by platforms can have a significant impact, especially on those who depend on them for income.
However, it is also important that platforms act to prevent abuse.
The right balance should be struck between the protection of victims and the rights of the accused, ensuring that decisions are fair and above all transparent.
Really interesting topic, my compliments.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit