At the moment when Donald Trump was attacked by the self-denounced "democratic world", it became more than obvious that plural democracy is merely a farce, under which a pajololan is practically a perverse, unethical struggle for the assimilation of the insignia of a different authoritarian power. Anyone who claims otherwise, should simply tell us how we can unite power and democracy; the functions of the violent leverage of submission and reign with a vast array of interests to be represented by equal people.

With this question, the essence of social scientists is put to the test. Namely, for millennia they are trying to justify democracy, from the ancient Greeks and Romans forwards, but they do not succeed. More or less co-create and substantiate matrix systems within which a person is similar to caught animals in a cage. Lately, many quasi-researchers are trying to discover the basic laws of socialism and movements within it, they are awarded some kind of doctorates and are terribly called academic names.

---

Modern social sciences, mass, free plagiarism; The copyright has expired, so many people overwrite it and state it without any consequences (Source: channel4.com)

---

The only contribution (certainly not science and society), are the trumpets of worthless transcribed and quoted materials. Simply put, in the social sciences, it will be extremely difficult to find a person who thinks with his own head; Yet he had to go and get through the system of inexorable parrot torture, which was dictated by boring, indifferent mentors.

As if thinkers, geniuses, creators, can we grow like tomatoes and other juicy harvest in some kind of hotbed?

Systems today driven by high-speed "academics" are merely matrices focused on the unification of mind, behaviour, and feelings. It's as if the craving for freedom or the aroma of freedom would have been framed within a limited mind! That's why we are where we are. The development and the path to the stars, the weeds from which we are, have stuck in the gates of human limitation. And if we can draw any decent conclusion from it, it is unambiguous that science and development can not be traced from quotations and repetition by obsessed scientists. Namely, they also by chance do not contribute anything to development. The reverse. They are part of a mill wheel, through which a lot of water flows from the natural circle, but it is still just rotating in the same place. Dynamics yes, but dialectics are none. And precisely in this is the essence of illusion, an illusion of modern social science.