Our American history mostly teaches us that the Civil War and most of the pivotal battles were fought in the east. In and around Virginia. I would submit that the Mississippi River and the control of it was the pivot that the entire war hung on.
In the first part of this series (available here) we discussed the geologic history of the river and it’s flow. The second part of the series (available here) was about the early human history in the valley. The third part (available here) went from European contact to full American influence. In the most current edition we looked at the “Americanization” of the River which is available here.
Civil War: Fire on the River
Civil war means many things, the very idea that part of a nation can turn on itself is part of it. High passions and fiery rhetoric is certainly a piece of the puzzle. At the end, what it really means to the US is that every single casualty, every single wound was to an American. The war is long since settled, and even the reasons for it is no longer debated. But the passion and rhetoric continue to simmer over 150 years later.
For the purpose of this narrative there will be no discussion of causes or even conditions that led up to the war except as they relate directly to the Mississippi River and it’s tributaries. It would be well served to remember that the North fought to keep the Union and the Country intact. The South fought to become a separate Country and change the borders forever. The effect being that the North fought the position of conqueror and the South only needed to fight a delaying action until the rest of the world recognized their sovereignty. This made the North the aggressor and the South the defenders.
The Importance of the Mississippi to Both Sides
The North was really still mostly in development stage in the Upper Mississippi River Valley and territory west of the River. They needed free and uninterrupted access to the Gulf of Mexico in order to grow and support the expansion.
The North had a pretty good railroad network, particularly east of the River that supported and contributed to the traffic on the river going both ways.
Southern Agriculture in general and particularly cotton drove the expansion south of the Mason-Dixon line. The South provided the fiber of the time to the entire world. Cotton drove the mills in New England and England where fabric was made on a huge scale. Cotton was the miracle of the time, and the uses went far beyond simple clothing. Though Riverboats were steam powered the Oceans of the world were covered with sailing vessels that needed acres of cotton fabric for the sails and lines.
The South’s Railroad network was nothing compared to the North. There was some problem with standard width of the rails, and really only one line that ran from the Atlantic all the way to the Mississippi. Most of the cotton made it’s way to the Mississippi via other rivers.
Both sides needed access and use of the Mississippi to further long term plans. Only one side could control the river so the stage was set.
It Is War
In 1861 most of the actual war was fought in the east. The North did establish a ‘River Squadron’ in their Navy and put three gunboats on the river based out of Cairo, Illinois. The Gunboats patrols of the middle Mississippi forced the South to use land fortifications to hold the River. The South entrenched and the North built boats.
The early war leadership of the Union forces was laughable and the Western Theater was no exception. It took several engagements until the North found it’s commander in US Grant who relied heavily on WT Sherman as a subordinate (Sherman did not start the war subordinate to Grant. He suffered a nervous breakdown quite early and Grant picked him off the scrap pile of officers to be his right hand).
The small Union fleet swung the balance that kept Missouri and Kentucky neutral in the war rather than going to the Confederate side. That one thing made a huge difference in the River War.
By early 1862 the land war had come to the River. The battle of Shiloh where Grant’s forces were surprised in an attack at Pittsburgh Landing on the Tennessee River. The Southern forces drove the Union forces up against the river but could not break through. Grant’s reinforced army counterattacked on the second day and chased the South back to the original lines. More than 24,000 Americans lost their lives in those two days, which was a higher total than the rest of the war had totaled to date.
The results were staggering to both sides, but it gave Grant the idea of ‘horrible math’ that he would pursue to the end of the war. Simply stated, the North had more resources and men than the South and they just had to wear the South out. Remember, the South was fighting defensively in their territory for most of the war.
Vicksburg
By the time of the Vicksburg campaign the North under Grant had reduced all the forts on the river to rubble and only Vicksburg kept the River from being completely in Northern control. In a brilliantly executed campaign Grant and Sherman continuously surprised the South and put Vicksburg under siege. Vicksburg was perched high on a cliff that dominated a bend in the Mississippi. The South had fortified and prepared but Grant used a water borne landing that got them close enough to the city to reduce it with cannon fire. A final land assault up the hills to Vicksburg and the Mississippi River was in control of the Union.
That effectively cut the South into two pieces, and took away their principal way to move troops and supplies. Grant would go on to become supreme commander of the Northern Armies and Sherman would make his infamous march to the Sea. The fall of Vicksburg almost insured the fall of the South.
The fall of Vicksburg in 1863 would start a new chapter for America and on the Mississippi River. In our next installment we will discover the ‘new way’ for America.
Unsourced Photos are used courtesy of the author.
While the words and ideas in this post are strictly those of the author these sources were referred to by me to insure numerical and historical accuracy.
Wikepedia: Mississippi River Campaigns
Wikipedia: Western Theater of the American Civil War
Authored by: @bigtom13
Adsactly is a society for freethinking people. Interested?
Click on the coin to join our Discord Chat
Vote @adsactly-witness for Steem witness!
Witness proposal is here:
Go To Steem Witness Page
In the bottom of the page type: adsactly-witness and press vote.
Use small letters and no "@" sign. Or, click here to vote directly!
Thank you!
Click on the coin to join our Discord Chat
Witness proposal is here:
Go To Steem Witness Page
In the bottom of the page type: adsactly-witness and press vote.
Use small letters and no "@" sign. Or, click here to vote directly!
Thank you!
I agree! Mississippi River being used as a commercial transport was too important factor for both North and South. And as I just found out from your article, the Mississippi River was one of the reason for North against South war. It’s hard to believe how devided they were especially politically and economically. I bet if both sides new the further future’s outcome, they would reconsider their options and 24k American lives would be saved.
And still remains to be miracle. The fall of Vicksburg is another very important part of the history I wasn’t aware of along with many other aspects I’ve learned from your “Mississippi River” articles.
Very educational and informative part of the history of America!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You just can't diminish the part the river played in the Civil War. The waterway itself and the 'Western Campaign' A known drunk (Grant) and a mentally weak little red head (Sherman) turned out to be the two best Generals the Union had, and both exhibited that talent in the Mississippi River campaign.
And the waterway itself. The North set up factories and built 'Ironclads' by the hundreds on the tributaries. That ability to manufacture and produce was the ultimate tipping point for the North.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@bigtom13, Yes, History always hold the War and in my opinion if anyone agree or not, but the most of the wars out of all happened just because to showcase the power and for the domination in my opinion.
And at the end of the day wars brought one result and that is many Deaths and Brutal Injuries. And for sure at that time if we would see any logical managers in the governments then many wars would not happen no matter which war we are talking.
But, yes, sometimes it's really easy to say but when situations born then people move in other directions. And most of the wars are occurred because to acquire the lands.
And if observe then, we can see that many media is constantly talking about the Wars but in my opinion these kind of news is not beneficial because it just spreads tension amongst masses.
Wishing you an great day and stay blessed. 🙂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The overall weakening of America as a result of the Civil War is apparent. One direct result was the flood of immigrants that 'rebuilt' the base of the country. There were entire regiments of Irish Immigrants that fought for the North. Those men, the ones that survived absolutely powered America into the 20th century.
The costs were appalling. 24,000 deaths in two days at Shiloh. Less than a year later more than double that at Gettysburg. The killing of humans on an industrial scale.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, that's really an unfortunate and painful aspect. Stay blessed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Quite revelation as it thrills; about the American Civil War in the course of the River Mississippi. Thanks @bigtom13 and @adsactly!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are certainly welcome. It is an obvious interest of mine.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
and now it's time to start a war against terrorism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Urrrggghhh. I think I'll leave that discussion for another time and probably another place.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
great article dear thanks for sharing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice post sir
Thank you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is a great #historic article and the pic's rock your article, it worth a resteem. 👍
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
gd informations
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit