[EDUCATION] The 10 worst reasons to go to school (part 2)

in education •  8 years ago  (edited)

For the first six reasons see the previous blog:
steemit.com/education/@steemswede/education-the-10-worst-reasons-to-go-to-school

7. "School creates social cohesion and community"

The nicest kind of community is created through voluntary association. Children and young people can get to know each other - across class, gender, and boundaries - in the Scouts, the book club, the soccer team, or in most other parts of civil society.

Viewing social cohesion as desirable doesn't imply that you ought to go to school. In fact, the school system, with its compulsory schooling and obligatory curriculum, is a pretty bad place to create community and cohesion. For many students, school is characterized by frustration, depression, bullying, humiliation, or just boredom. These are not evidence of a flourishing community, but rather of social deprivation. If any other social institution would have the same social problems politicians would have campaigned for the elimination of it.

8. "You need basic skills to be able to search for information online"

Basic skills that everyone needs can't possibly take more than a few years of training to learn. Primary school is nine years. Remember that there are quite a lot of knowledge floating around in popular culture that normally gifted children should be able to pick up through cultural osmosis. No single child growing up in Sweden can reach adulthood without having heard of the Roman Empire, DNA, or the solar system, regardless of whether they went to school or not.

If you necessarily want to have compulsory schooling (which you don't) the kids can learn the basic knowledge through compulsory courses in elementary school, and then get to choose topics themselves. Basic skills that are primarily needed in a particular subject can be taught to the students that choose to study that particular subject. It doesn't take four years to learn about the basic concepts of biology if you don't intend to work with biology, and it doesn't take nine years to learn basic skills in math if you don't intend to become a mathematician. This so well reflects on the inefficiency of statism and central planning.

If school had only focused on the basic knowledge and let the rest of the education focus on things that the students were interested in, instead of compulsory modules that can be replaced with a Google search, it would have been a clear improvement, and truancy would probably decrease. But as it is now school is designed in that way and as a result many parts of the education is a waste of the students' time.

9. "Primary school is about preparation for upper secondary school, and upper secondary school is about becoming employable or get into college"

First of all, this is a logical error. Electrician companies could train their own electricians, law firms their own lawyers, and hospitals their own doctors, but this is prohibited. Instead, you have to go through centrally planned courses to obtain a state-approved exam.

Secondly, this position becomes very interesting if we consider it in isolation. According to this reasoning students only ought to take as many academic points they need to enter the desired education or graduate, and then ignore all the other studies. Seen in a vacuum this position actually advocates for more truancy, not less.

10. "School teaches you to work with people you don't like"

Obviously not, considering how many children it is that skip school, refuse to work together, and even kill themselves. School rather teaches you to try and avoid people you don't like. If you just want to teach children to socialize in general, they can do that just as well in sports clubs or similar.

Bet let's say that you're trying to convince a student to not cut class by talking about how he or she  must learn to work with people that he or she doesn't like. What if the class ends up with a good group dynamic where everyone agrees? Reasonably in this case we ought to break this and other such classes up and mix them until they become conflicted and dysfunctional.

Furthermore, I question what kind of insane workplaces people go to where they hate their fellow workers as much as many students despise their classmates. It sounds like a completely untenable work situation, and if I had ended up in such a workplace my first thought would have been "how do I find a new job", and not "how lucky I am that school taught me to hate myself enough to work with these people."

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

As with so many things, it's not exactly school that is the problem, is it? Its government schooling, central planning and the like. I don't really know how schools would be like without an authoritative state, but I bet it could answer these issues well. If it couldn't, it would be outcompeted for one that could.

Ah, there's one other argument that kept popping up in conversations with leftists a few years ago: schools create gender equality by allowing females to work while the state takes care of their children. I bet you don't love this argument either.

Yes, because taking care of your children and the home is apparently "slavery" according to feminists/leftists. This narrative together with "empowerment through careerism" for women has only led to declining birthrates and broken families. But the state feminism narrative goes something like women who wants to stay at home with her child the first years are ”trapped” while a man expressing the same wish is considered to be ”equal”.

Those most affected by state feminism policies are the children. The effect has largely been that women work twice (home+career) and that the children get less time with their parents, which of course also means more stressed parents that in turn have detrimental effects on parenting. Recent studies also show that men who take more responsibility at home have a higher risk of being burnt out. So no one wins in the current situation, least of all the children who barely get to see their parents and develop all the interpersonal and social skills required for the future.

just by the title i can tell this will be one if not the best thing i read today

I hope so :) Be sure to read the first part also.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

I generally hate school. and will never go back!!! Never!!!! and Ive been out a really long time. Its not the best environment for learning. It prepares you for mediocrity as well at least grade 1-12.

Most geniuses throughout history were quite rebellious in school. Just look at Isaac Newton.

I love your last line.
We need to conform to the norm because if we dont then we are social outcasts and could wind up being like the school shooters!
That is complete garbage.
Home school your children and let them grow up with you at home, I say.
I was homeschooled for the first 12 years of my life. Then the public school system came after my parents.
It was so stupid. Now parents get into trouble if children ditch.
They need to back off this "you dont own your children" nonsense.
One parent was told that they couldnt homeschool because they "didnt know enough to do it". What a slap in the parents face!
:(

thanks for sharing this material, I like what you posted. Thank you so much