Transcript:
9/11 is a 2017 film directed by Martin Guigui. starring Charlie Sheen, Gina Gershon, Luis Guzman, Wood Harris and Whoopie Goldberg.
It follows the interactions and experiences of a small group of people trapped in an elevator in the North Tower of the World Trade Centre during the terrorist attacks (which is what they absolutely and categorically were) of September 11, 2001. So please join me, if you will, in my learned review of 9/11.
Well, let me begin by saying that this is a delightful and nuanced film that tells a small personal story of a group of characters without entertaining the distasteful and unscrupulous conspiracy theories that are often associated with the larger story of 9/11.
It's quite literally a breath of fresh air -- ironic given that they are trapped in an elevator - and especially given some of the so-called "documentary" films that are perfidiously distributed on the internet.
I'm compelled to say that if one could conjure the emotion of the events that unfolded that day, one might conclude that it should have caused quite a measure of trauma to the psyche of the masses.
It's appalling to think that any group or organisation considered it necessary to inflict such tragedy in order to affect the thinking of the masses.
But that's not the focus of the film, no not at all. In fact the terrorist attacks of 9/11 are but a backdrop to the character study that is front and centre of the film.
Not only does the film wisely avoid any contradiction of the trustworthy official narrative of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but it manages to focus on its characters and their unique conflicts and disagreements. The film is, for wont of a better term, one of class warfare in an elevator. And of course, I'm not one to discourage a bit of healthy debate amongst the different classes, hehe!
In the elevator, we have the five main characters, a group of unlikely and non-typical individuals from varying economic backgrounds and classes. You have:
- The young, attractive professional girl who has wisely agreed to align herself to a wealthy, and one would presume older, gentleman.
- The African American delivery man, who expresses unfounded distaste for Pakistanis and Filipinos. Who would have thought a person of color could be the racist, eh? Delightfully original!
- The Puertorican father who still somehow gets to do all the hard work despite being the least athletic member of the group. They really are terrible good workers, are they not?
- The stubborn and ungrateful ex-wife who continues to resist her husband, despite the fact that all he ever did was attempt to provide for her and their children.
- And then we have Charlie Sheen's character of Jeffrey Cage, a thoroughly likeable self-made entrepreneur, who has not only found modest wealth within a single iteration of his family lineage, but is also refined and honourable, and also proves to be quite heroic by the end of the narrative.
You'll find this typical of the upper class, and it's a refreshing sea change to locate a film that stands up for the common billionaire, as we do tend to endure an excessive allocation of public criticism.
It would be remiss of me to continue without mentioning the genius casting of Charlie Sheen in the lead role. The once adamant, but now thoroughly discredited, conspiracy theorist has finally acquiesced to the more reasoned narrative provided by the credible mainstream media.
If there were some kind of shadowy conspiracy afoot on 9/11, I'm certain the free press would have seen fit to report it to the public at large. I must admit I do find it utterly delightful that Charlie Sheen has seen fit to "eat crow" so to speak; to realise the error of his ways and submit to realignment of his previously egregious thoughts and paranoid whimsy.
But the real power of this film is not the casting or the setting, but the astute observations it makes about the upper class and our natural propensity toward altruism and heroic deeds.
Of course, I'm not one to get emotionally entangled in mere dramatic entertainments, but I must admit the speech made by Jeffrey Cage's wife pointing out the hard work and dedication required to obtain even a small assembly of financial wealth, may have left one a little choked up, should one have an inclination to such base emotional reactions.
The ending goes on to reinforce this idea, and exemplifies how heroic the corporate upper class can be. Like Al Gore sacrificing everything for carbon taxes -- to fight climate change, mind you -- or Bill Gates exterminating poor people -- from the tragic fate of a Polio infestation.
With great wealth becomes great responsibility, and you can never know that weight until it is thrust upon you.
So we are heroes. And what we do is heroic. If you really understood our unenviable position in society, you would likely refrain from begrudging us any modest profit we might have earned on the side.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have one particularly unenviable chore to accomplish before the evening is concluded. I hope you'll permit me leave until the subsequent instalment of Elite Reviews, residing right here on the Popcorn Lobotomy channel...
I believe the towers were empty. I could never figure out how they rigged the building to explode (maybe dew) but if there were only a small number of floors occupied, then nobody would KNOW!!!!! Earth is Flat and everything is a LIE! I saw 2nd bldg fall from schwab in Jersey City across river in NJ, so I know I saw it, it was just a building implosion though, made to look like an attack, to get MOAR WAR, but no one died, sandy hook, boston bombing, las vegas shooting , pretty much all of them are bullshit, IKNOW I sound OUT odf my mind SO DO NOT believe me BUT look and you may be surprised.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Keep in mind, this is a satirical caricature of an elite oligarch. It's supposed to be humorous -- he's probably lying with every breath, or at least backing up the consensus of his rich country club buddies.
As for whether the 9/11 attacks were genuine terrorism, state sponsored, or somewhere in between, I'll say just one thing. The mainstream explanation for the towers (and building 7) falling sucks donkey balls and there has never been a proper, unbiased investigation.
How were the buildings rigged to explode? I actually came up with an explanation for that.
What if it's common practice to rig newly-built skyscrapers for demolition? Think about it, buildings are always designed with an end-of-life in mind. Why not plan for that and factor in the inevitable demolition into the construction process?
If they did, it would most certainly be a secret from the public. You don't want to cause a panic or have companies refuse to rent space in your building, right?
I did some digging and found a obscure podcast with a guy who claims his father quit during construction of the WTC when he found out it was being built pre-wired.
Check it out, it's pretty interesting. Let me know what you think.
http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-Howard%20Lewis%20III.mp3
As for flat earth... yeah, I'm not there yet, man, sorry.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Totally could have rigged it with explosive at the beginning, it looks like it was planned a LONG time ago. I have put in 9 months learning this bullshit, and it is PROGRAMMING. The shit I say I KNOW sounds CRAZY. Ya know what I mean, I have been on the other side, and I am sure you know people (MOST) who think that dudes from a cave orchestrated a successful attack on the brain of the military lol, so look at those people- to them YOU are FAR FAR out there "rigged freaking explosives since the building was built? " they chuckle at you. I either laughed at or thought NO Fu$% WAY on every single thing I say. It is a weird world I live in, I am not craazy.
I will try and listen to pod cast tomorrow, interesting, but that is what I USED too think also, JUST what YOU think haha, so I have seen LOTS of videos where that was discussed as an option and definitely a VALID one, just it has lots of "issues" that I could not accept.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I haven't heard the idea discussed much at all, and couldn't find any when the idea occurred to me. Would be interested in any links you might have...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just looked into this more. AAron Dover is the Guy that I found that brought this up. I made a youtube video for richiefromboston for his Christmas GUEST Interview contest, I WANT to be on his SHOW LOL!
First link is my vid last night -how long would it take to get 50k people in a tower with 24 local EVLEVATORS!!!!! It would take HOURS! I could very well be wrong, but the evidence MAKES SENSE TY for treating me so nicely with such an INSANE IDEA, I have gotten used to thinking this way and forget how NUTS this stuff is lol. PEACE if you neeed more let me know, let me know what you think if you look ty
If you want me to REMOVE LINKS LET ME KNOW!! (i hoe u not mad at me - no interest in spamming u!!)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No worries about the links, I asked for 'em.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit