我们吃的每一件食物，都不能完全放心，我们不知道食物的生产全过程。如果自己种植食物，如如一个记者写下的，一个农民说，城里人的抗药性强，他把自己吃的和卖出去的分开种。有一个纪录片，一个卖有机蔬菜的商人，他的产品，因为古法种植，品相不好看，价格贵。没人买。这个商人雇用的一位老农民说，他的绿色蔬菜显然卖不出去，他带记者看自己的菜地，都是放了农药的，没有虫子。他也说，以前可以游泳的河，现在已经成了污水河，同时也说，农药对人没事。这个农民在做的事情是相互矛盾的，他说古法种植的蔬菜卖不出去，却被人雇佣做古法种植。他说环境恶化了，却又有一种自己用农药是在顺应时代浪潮的感觉。
如果一个农民把自己吃的和拿出去卖的分开种，前提是他觉得吃农药的蔬菜不好，如果他觉得不好，他会坚持种安全蔬菜。如果觉得古法种植不能卖出去，那么他就会拒绝被雇去种植这种卖不了的粮食。如果觉察出环境在前所未有的恶化，那么他不会觉得使用农药是对的。
还有一件事情是，农民卖出去的价格，和我们在超市买到价格差了很多倍。而且，有期货商会故意少购入，造成水果蔬菜稀少的样子，借此抬高价格，农产品的价格会被进一步拉低。而且大多数农民没办法直接接触到消费者。如果可以直接卖给消费者，中间就会少增值税等税收环节，那财政收入肯定会减少。所以城管会驱赶这些种植者，或者让人们觉这不很光彩。我们不清楚有包装纸，有厂家是否比没有这些的更安全，更有保障，我们也不明白路边摊是否比门店更脏。因为看到鸿茅药酒，看到牙膏里面放医用止血剂，看到康师傅，看到火锅店里的底料循环利用。看到辣条的制成。看到僵尸肉熟食。看到假芝麻油，看到水果的催熟。我更愿意买有机商品。即使价格高，但是可以吃呀。
人性是矛盾的，分的出善恶，向善，却未必一直向善，总有些迫不得已，总有些万一，而根据墨菲定律，这些即使是不希望的事情，也一定会发生。而选择在这之前已经做好了。当意识到不希望的事情可能会出现，那时候就是选择向善还是向恶。在国家破产之日里面的那个小作坊主，在国家破产之后，这条经济链一断，他没有做错什么，只是处在一个错误的时间点上，是一个经济周期中的牺牲品，扩张导致破产了，躲债过程中导致了另一个人信任他而自杀，这个人从此告诉儿子不要信任任何人。他从一个有工匠精神的人转向了雇非法劳工的黑心老板。而当他意识到可能会有他不希望看到的事情发生的时候，就会做出以后的选择，男人因为处在社会上的特权阶层，比女性的等级更高，有更强的虚荣心，也更难放弃，一个人的虚荣心越强，就可能越会被自己的未来欺骗。做出了自己都难以左右的抉择。所以一些人笔下的不要逞一时的面子，就是指在用别人眼里的评价，在装点自己的虚荣心。
因为人的虚荣心导致了未来一定会出现的欺骗。环境会怎样？好坏？->坏 保护还是破坏？->破坏
拯救还是抛弃？->抛弃（如果到了这里就是20年后的海洋中的那句“毫无疑问，我们会找到办法，生存下去，问题是这样的生存是否还有意义”）霍金所说的人类必须离开地球，就是这个意思，人们会问自己愿意吗，最后还是会选择抛弃地球，而霍金的肯定和希望我们改变，理性的霍金选择相信人类不会改变。会被人类无尽的欲望给吞灭，像赫胥黎的美丽的新世界里那样，向未来简史中描绘的那样 。而公民自由主义者和警惕暴政的理性者主义者没有考虑到人类接近无限的享乐消遣的欲望，如法国哲学家Bernard-Henri Lévy所说，只有拥抱人性的不确定，才踏上了一条真正高尚的道路，通向自由的道路。
We eat every food, are not completely rest assured, we do not know the food production whole process. If plant trees food, such as such as a reporter written, a farmer say, the city's resistance strong, he himself to eat and sell out separately species of. Has a documentary, a sell organic vegetables businessman, he's products, since ancient planting, product phase ugly, expensive. No one to buy this merchant hire an old farmer said, he's Green vegetables obviously not sell, he with reporters look at their own vegetable, are put pesticides, no insects. He also said before you can swim the River, and now has become sewage River, but also said, pesticide for people all right. This farmers in to do is conflicting, he said ancient growing vegetables not sell, but to be employed to do ancient planting. He said environment worsened, but there is a own with pesticides in comply with age wave feeling. If a farmer himself to eat and come up to sell the separate species, provided that he felt eat pesticides vegetables bad, if he felt bad, he will adhere to kinds of security vegetables. If you think ancient planting not sell, then he will be refused to be employed to planting this sell not the food. If aware of the environment in unprecedented deterioration, then he will not think use pesticide is right. There is one thing is, farmers sold prices, and we are in the supermarket buy price difference a lot of times. Moreover, there futures Chamber of Commerce deliberately less purchase, resulting in fruits and vegetables rare look, use this to raise prices, produce the price will be further pull down. But most of farmers no way direct exposure to the consumer. If can directly sold to consumers, middle will be less VAT and other tax link, that revenue certainly will reduce. So urban management will drive away these growers, or make people think this is not very light color. We do not know there wrapping paper, a factory whether than not those of the safer and more secure, we do not understand roadside stalls whether than stores more dirty. Because see Hong Mao wine, see toothpaste inside put medical hemostasis agent, see the master, see hot pot the store's the end of material recycling. See spicy article is made. See zombie meat cooked. See false Sesame oil, see the fruit of ripening. I prefer to buy organic products. Even if the price high, but you can eat it. Humanity is contradictory, points out of good and evil, to the good, but may not have been to the good, the total some compelling, total some in case, and according to Murphy's law, these even do not want things, but also will occur. And choose in prior to this has been well. When realize that do not want things may occur, at that time is choose to good or to evil. At the National bankruptcy date of the inside of the small workshop main, at the National bankruptcy after this economic chain a break, he did not do wrong what, just in an error point in time, is a business cycle in the victim, expansion lead to go bankrupt, hide debt process led to another person trust him and suicide, the people from this tell son don't trust anyone. Him from an artisan spirit of the people turned-employed illegal labor black heart boss. And when he realized there may be he did not want to see the things happen when will be made after choice men as in the community of privilege class, than women's rating higher, have stronger Vanity, also more difficult to give up, a person of Vanity stronger, you may more will be own future deception. Make their own are difficult to left and right choice. So some people described don't boast a time of face, it is in use the eyes of others reviews, in decorate your Vanity. Because people Vanity lead to the future will appear deception. Environment will how? Good or bad? -> bad protection or damage? -> damage to save or abandoned? -> abandon (if to here is 20年 after the Ocean in the phrase "there is no doubt, we will find the way, survive, problem is that survive whether there meaning") Hawking said human must leave the Earth, is the meaning, people will be asked own willing to do, and finally or choose to abandon the Earth, and Hawking's certainly and hope that we change, rational Hawking select believe human will not change. Will be human endless desire to swallow off, like Huxley beautiful new world where, as to future a brief history depicted in as. Citizen Liberals and alert tyranny of Reasoner who did not take into account the human close to unlimited pleasures pastime desire, such as French philosopher bernard-henri lévy said, only to embrace of human nature of uncertain, only embark on a real Noble road, leading to free the road.