I do believe the EOS design is superior in many aspects to Ethereum, starting with DPOS compared to Casper (Casper scares me big time as it would mean taking steps in the opposite direction of decentralization and democratization of the platform).
On the other hand, something that scares me nearly as much if not more is the very polemic token distribution with those dubious terms and conditions promoted by the EOS team that just seem to be oriented to 1) making block.one very rich and 2) crashing Ethereum capitalization. Would love @dan to comment on that and clearly explain what the intention is with the model of token distribution and the fact that they won't even be valid in EOS.