Identity validation, vote canceling, dispute resolution, bonded behavior, n2 reward curve.
RE: Proof of Good Governance
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Proof of Good Governance
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
MIH! Make It Happen.
Who are the thugs? See the downvoters of my earlier comment!
I wish you and loved ones the happiest New Year!
I shall make this year different by making it the same.
Kindest Regards,
@haejin
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it hadn't been a hypocrite reducing your rewards and it had been for the benefit of the community rather than an excuse to line their own pockets, would you have reacted differently?
This is a genuine question.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Identity validation - is it not attempted already?
vote canceling - by who?
dispute resolution , bonded behavior - what do you mean?
n2 reward curve - you mean n^2 reward curve like before HF18?
Would it not make large abusers even more powerful?
Only difference for them, is that it would make them concentrate their Steem in less accounts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
When you say identity validation, do you mean connecting real-world identities to Steem identities? Or just identifying individuals on the network to prevent abuse by bots?
and on vote-canceling, I thought rewards pool is paid out periodically, and once it does that transaction is recorded and made irreversible.
dispute resolution would require Steemit to adopted a constitution, and there will elected individuals, mostly likely from the pool of Witnesses that would have to make decisions that are not programmatic, moving out from the realm of computer-science into legal theory. Do you think Steem is ready for that?
I don't quite understand the last two points but I'm very interested in what you've named as bonded behavior; can you elaborate?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@dan Identity validation seems pretty useless to me. At the end there are more dead people, than alive, so if there would be a need, it won’t be a problem to get as many identities as needed. I believe that’s the wrong path. The better one would be to leave all curation to the users and focus on growing the community as much as possible (crab bucket mentality).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Happy New year @dan! My opinion is to have:
reputation separate from SP and it should be harder to gain and easier to loose?
Have random upvote periods (encrypted for 7 days) so that it's harder to coordinate attacks.
Proof-of-human® is also essential but how to do it? Sign/Hash/Encrypt all your fingersprints and ask randomly for one of those prints? A couple of modern phones have digital fingerprint readers...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Proof-of-human
Proof-of-ban-from-china. How to hide your person when goverment is coming?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, don't use your real name and use a VPN? Or Tor?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dear @dan! I have met with interest very many of your proposals. For Steem completely different algorithm at the blockchain level is needed, which would help eliminate any abusements. Mathematics is power! Let's try to come up with such an algorithm.
Maybe we should make all the content anonymous? Do not pay attention to the authors, vote only for worthy posts. Maybe you just need to increase curatorial rewards or even cancel them altogether.
All problems in the field of high technology should be solved with the help of mathematics. I completely agree with the opinion of some people that at the moment very much does not work correctly.
It is not advantageous for me to vote for "quality content" because it brings very little money. Nobody wants to waste their time picking diamonds for other people. The award to the curators must at least be increased 1000 times. Yes. I said it right. People who are looking for great articles need to earn more. This is my main idea.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The very Idea that self voting earns a reward is bizarre to me. If we must assign a value for a self vote we could make it negative couldn't we? Then it shows that the author is willing to make the sacrifice to stand behind their own work so maybe you should up vote it too.....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hello @dan, I wanna see how these thugs can add a flag on this post.
Please check out this screen shot below and decide for yourself.
This is what I have earned below personally by following @haejin blogs.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am also for identitiy validation, thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit