Oh, I've skimmed through the White Paper last week and all I see is marketing and promises of great things. What I did not see is a working application, which would produce a product or a service to the community.
As I just replied to another user, people are currently investing time (and soon - money) in their dreams, not in something with proven value.
Let's get a bit technical - answer these questions before investing in EOS:
What is the difference between a typical blockchain and EOS, which claims to be a blockchain operating system?
Why would Steem be fast enough for Steemit ("Steem can handle a larger userbase than Reddit"), but not fast enough for its future clones?
Which brings us to the logical question - What is the practical value of starting 100s of Steemit clones - is Steemit so popular that it outperforms Reddit and Facebook, that we need a second one, let alone a hundred clones of it?
Where is the proof of concept - a variety of applications, serving the needs of different businesses, who use the EOS platform? Are there even examples of what EOS can be used for?
If you didn't answer any of the above questions, consider this - would you buy the promise of a great product (ala Kickstarter, where most projects fail, while being horrendously overinvested in - remember the 300 thousand dollar self filling bottle?) or would you buy (invest in) the completed and working product, which will be useful to you?
No, right? Because if you get in early, you will become a millionaire, right?
Hence my point, that unless you have thousands to invest in EOS and grab a bigger portion, you will not profit much - that is, if this project turns out to be successful and not yet another new cryptocurrency, created with the sole purpose of cashing in on the hype of wanna-be-millionaires.
There's something else to consider - I may be saying that there will be big investors buying EOS, but the truth is, that thousands of people with $10k in their pocket are much more powerful than a couple of rich guys. And rich guys usually don't invest in marketing talk - they want to see working examples of what is promised.
So unless you can see the amount of money being invested by single individuals, during the bid process, I would still consider this a bad investment. Hah, it just occured to me - even if you could see the amount invested, it will be spread out over 341 days - you wouldn't know if a rich person is investing 1/341 of his capital or a poor guy throwing 100% of his cash for some EOS.
Mainly Parallel Performance & Partial Evaluation of Blockchain State
This is just an example ...nothing more.
You are getting ahead of yourself here. Those apps are 1-2 years down the road after the lunch of the blockchain
Any web based service or application currently being run on a centralized server.
Regarding WHEN and IF it's worth to invest on this project. Well that's up to each individual's decision
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So this is not an operating system, but a parallelized (multi-threaded) blockchain. A marketing trick for non-techies.
Also, from what I've read in the white paper, this is only implemented on certain levels, where the software logic allows that. So we have a faster blockchain, despite Steem already being fast enough to support a network bigger than Reddit (according to its own developers).
Where it falls short is lack of examples for its use, i.e. it has no purpose, but it was built. Someone mentioned an eBay site, powered by EOS, because there wouldn't be transaction costs. But there will be transaction costs at the exchange, converting fiat or other cryptos to EOS. That is, if you can even convince 99% of ebay's users that this is better than ebay (and there's no reason why it will be, as EOS doesn't create any advantage).
Everyone is investing in the hype, kickstarter style. The winner is EOS's marketing department and the investors.
As I mentioned in another post, I would invest in EOS once I see unique software running on it. Then any EOS I have will slowly increase in value. Until that moment, it's just speculative bidding, favoring only the developers and their initial investors.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Anyone investing during the first year of the token launch on the Ethereum network will be doing it for one of two reasons:
Of course we haven't seen the actual blockchain in operation let alone any apps running on it. However we do know what the Graphene architecture (Bitshares) and Chainbase (Steem's modified version of Graphene) can do.
If the EOS team can build a parallelized (multi-threaded) blockchain on top of this architecture then the whole crypto space will have a higher bar to be measured up against.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree. It's just that I don't see this technology answering any unmet needs of the digital world - I still perceive it as a cash-on-hype type of project. I guess we'll see if there will be a new cryptocurrency next year or all efforts will go into popularizing and developing for EOS.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit