This post is trying to answer Two New Check Mark Criteria questions outlined by @eosgo in their BP candidates criteria post(https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/740/two-new-criteria-for-eos-block-producer-candidates-in-report-9#latest).
1)Block Producer Candidate Roadmap on values, community project timeline, finances, transparency, or any other topic the candidate deems important. Please show the direction and future of your candidacy in a Steem post for the community.
The value of the EOSeco team is to contribute more to the ecosystem of EOS, and bring diversity and prosperity to EOS.
The financial principle of EOSeco is that we will use all of the block rewards for the entire EOS ecology. We have already get VC investment and could support at least two-year service for BP node.
Our roadmap is :
April 2018, Set-up of EOSeco dAPP fund;
May 2018, meetup in Shanghai and Beijing;
June 2018, Campaign for election as a block producer;
July 2018, EOSeco toolkit for EOS holder, including wallet, blockchain explorer, dapp store, etc.
August 2018, EOSeco community meetup nationalwide in China;
December 2018, Providing trainning and dev tool to EOSeco develop community.
by the year 2019，enrich dapp ecosystem and enlarge EOSeco user community.
2)Position on Dividends (The sharing of Block Producer inflation rewards with unaffiliated voters, AKA "vote buying.")
Based on the current EOS constitution, EOSeco will never offer EOS token payment to EOS token voters for any reason, including BP elections AND worker proposals, and EOSeco would not enter into an alliance with some voters. EOSeco will review this issue if the related terms of EOS constitutions are modified in the future. Our above views are currently being published on Steemit in writing. The link is:https://steemit.com/eos/@eoseco2018/eoseco-s-bp-candidate-roadmap-and-position-on-dividends
My motto:
Listen, smile, agree, and then do whatever you were gonna do anyway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit