RE: Proposal for an incremental Constitution and Dapp layer governance on EOS

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Proposal for an incremental Constitution and Dapp layer governance on EOS

in eos •  6 years ago 

If ECAF/EMAC are named as the sole arbitrator on the protocol layer then they provide the access for states to make these kinds of requests.

How would they convince ECAF/EMAC to act? Threats probably.

eos
6 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    1
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  6 years ago 

    No matter how many threats they make against ECAF it doesn't have any effect. If the case is not a dispute over certain articles in the constitution, ECAF can't do anything about it. ECAF simply doesn't have the authority to make those rulings.

    If ECAF makes a ruling that's clearly outside of its jurisdiction, it will be immediately noticed and ECAF's indepencency will be seen as compromised. Until this has been dealt with, no rulings from ECAF will be taken seriously.

    If ECAF/EMAC are named as the sole arbitrator on the protocol layer

    Protocol layer = the constitution. ECAF can't do anything about things outside of the constitution.

    then they provide the access for states to make these kinds of requests.

    Please, write down the whole case like you think it would go. Then you can see it is practically impossible to happen in real life.

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00