It's not a unilateral power, it's a process that can either be respected or ignored by block producers.
RE: First EOS Arbitration Order
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
First EOS Arbitration Order
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
leaving BPs to make decisions, what could possibly go wrong? next you hear is they censor accounts...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then they are voted out, you're selectively interpreting information and seemingly ignoring the economics of DPoS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
People are really ignoring the power that token holders has. They are the one electing BP's. So in the long run, their interest will be protected. It's all about TRUST. U will not use a system if you don't trust it. I think BPs acted promptly to secure members properties, which is define some how in the constitution. It's really new in the industry and we should discuss and contribute to make it better.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreeing with you @ash. The EOS blockchain is going to allow great things, but freedom isn't necessarily one of them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit