'Overall you are net positive. That is what matters in cryptos :P', well, no. As Bulleth stated, it's the principle here that matters. Smart contracts are there to ensure everything works properly, which it clearly doesn't. The contract stated a certain fee, which afterwards doesn't appear to be the right amount, that's weird.
RE: Dear Vitalik ... you owe me $13.54 USD (Part 1)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dear Vitalik ... you owe me $13.54 USD (Part 1)
I didn't mean that he should give up the fight he is taking up. I think I should update the comment so that it is not construed wrongly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nah I liked the comment that's why I put it up top lol
I think you are both right, what you suggested in your original comment is a great way of looking at life. My whole rant was pretty tongue-in-cheek, I didn't feel like posting charts today and this gave me inspiration to post something different.
Having said that, I think the whole thing is ridiculous, isn't the whole idea of smart contracts that no one gets screwed because computers execute them to a strict set of conditions?
I can not wait for EOS, this experience is a perfect example of Ethereum's many short comings :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit