They should have simply burnt 50% of the fees and the rest redistributed to stakers. It'd kill 2 birds with one stone. Currently it's Burn Vs Redistribute and I see good arguments from both sides. 50/50 Burn & Redistribute methods seems the most sensible for me.
RE: Dan Larimer Proposes Compound Interest For Staking
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dan Larimer Proposes Compound Interest For Staking
Well if it's a choice between burn and redistribute then that would seem like a reasonable compromise.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It should satisfy both parties and wouldn't even be that hard to implement. they could even use an algorithm to decide the burn percentage. PIVX is using an algorithm to deice the masternode rewards to keep the masternodes level in the network in check to maintain larger token liquidity and velocity.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit