Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

You mean they do not have enough time to be so diligent as I am? That's why I occasionally step up and take things on my own desk voluntarily.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

You really have to get it out of your head... while my investigation might be the reason why you are on that bot's list, it still doesn't make it my bot.

And about having to work. I'll give you that, I personally wouldn't have the time and energy to create all that pointless content from multiple accounts.

But that's really none of my concern what anyone does with their free time. You might think that I am wasting mine, but I do feel rewarded by my own sense for righteousness when I am doing what I do here.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

what do you need the account for?

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

I'd like to know how you think I could be profiting from down-votes.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

mack-bot is not his bot, it is one from steemcleaners.
And as you are abusing Steemit there will be no reason to put you off the blacklist.

You can make it a personal matter if you so desire.

I have done my background checks and reviews thoroughly and I can back up all my claims.

I'll say again, feel free to ask @steemcleaners for a review, I am sure, if they find the time, they'll come to the same conclusion I have laid out.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

You're so funny, you just flagged their reply!

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

I'm not doing any tricks, and I refuse to accept that you want to continue the line of work you are in, plagiarism, copy/pasting and upvoting spam does not contribute any value.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Make a clarification as to which accounts are owned by yourself and who your friends are and we can have a constructive discussion about things.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

So you need an example? Ok. A credible clarification could sound like this:

"I am using the account @steemupvoters because I thought I could scam people into buying votes, but that wasn't a reasonable idea so now I just use that account to spam low-effort postings"

that would be something like a start, or you could just get it all off your chest and be fully honest

"We are a group of friends from Indonesia who signed up for 100 accounts to farm the reward pool and gain rewards through circlevoting. That's what people do here and we didn't want to miss out on free money! We understand that what we have done is not in the best interest of the platform and we are sorry. Here is the list of accounts we are using: @malemdiwa, @steemupvoters, @rezaleoni, @rezaleoni500, @rezadolah, @fadhila, @fadhilaceh... etc etc"

I think it's pitiful to see you acting all clueless here!

  ·  7 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

That's a pretty strange explanation considering that 87.1% of your voting power have gone directly to @rezaleoni and @fadhilaceh, the latter of which is one of your "friends" who has supposedly authorized you to republish his "interesting" content - so you certainly must know him!

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

@rezaleoni, @rezaleoni1, @rezaleoni2, @rezaleoni100, @rezaleoni200, @rezaleoni300, @rezaleoni400, @rezaleoni500, @rezaleoni600, ...

I know I am walking on a limb here, but you are probably not the victim...

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Reposting content from other steem-accounts translated to multiple languages.

This would be considered copy/paste or plagiarism if you wouldn't operate those account yourself for the purpose of reward farming.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)Reveal Comment

You are spamming the same low value content repeatedly from multiple accounts and you want me to explain what's wrong about that. If the obvious logic escapes your understanding then I am unsure what more I could possibly explain.

Also, since your voting activity has been mainly used to support other instances of plagiarism and spam in your group, your intentions quite obviously do not include the promotion of "interesting" content.

What is wrong?

Generally speaking, if the situation was legitimate, you'd at least credit the original author and link the original article. But since it's not a legitimate situation, that would make your scheme a bit too obvious I presume

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

That's a rather silly question, your voting activity is not very diverse and I am certain you are aware of the situation.

I am still piecing together how many actual people you are and I've started with a small batch of accounts that clearly intentionally support spam and plagiarism. I am giving the benefit of doubt to some of the other participants for now, but I'll keep watching...

If there's anything you'd like to explain from your end, I am all ears!