20 upvotes and $687 in a minute, this is crazy.
RE: Important news about using ETH and ETC from Vitalik
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Important news about using ETH and ETC from Vitalik
Important news about using ETH and ETC from Vitalik
20 upvotes and $687 in a minute, this is crazy.
haha bc blocktrades voted for itself
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They just make use of the Steem Power they have acquired. And with power comes both privilege and risk/responsibility.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Everyone's posts are automatically set to upvote as soon as it is posted.. so due to the 0.8.0 release and the 15 minute curation delay @blocktrades actually doesn't benefit as much as they would if they waited 15 minutes (as I understand it) so it's actually generous considering they[blocktrades] know that as a huge part of steemit all of their posts will trend..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Man, I would really want someone to write a well thought-out article, someone with the knowledge about wth is happening lately and what is causing this massive troll uproar. I have given up on trying to follow it on reddit as that site has become filled with shills.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The chat box at Poloniex crypto trading exchange has gone full muppet overdrive. There is actually trolls taking shifts copying and pasting the same SH!!T. I too would like to see some sorta unbiased journalist investigate this summer blockbuster. It gone all Hollywood sensationalism. Here 's link you that could lead some people who click , down a rabbit hole if they think .It was posted Febuary 2015 https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/2w08qk/progress_on_the_bomb/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am still not getting this... in terms of curation reward one would be better off to wait 30min from post creation right?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes. 30 minutes after the creation gives you the most benefit. But it's gradual: the earlier you vote the bigger part of your curation reward ends up with the post author - which is not bad in some cases.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
pardon my ignorance but who would then be voting from minute 0 to minute 30 of creation? for which benefit?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You might want to do it for the benefit of the author. If you see a nice post by an unknown author and feel you want to give up your award for so that the author gets more (and also the post has a bigger chance to be noticed) - then you vote early. So it's a kind of altruistic action.
But please note that this process is not black-and-white, e.g. if you vote 15 minutes after the creation you achieve an outcome which is something between voting after 0 minutes and voting after 30 minutes. You would need to refer to the official documentation for the exact algorithm that controls the curation reward.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
perfect, thanks for the reply, much appreciated
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit