I'm not twisting anything. Look at the tweets.

Omeid mentions that one of the team members working on Bitcoin Cash called for the legalisation of child porn. Buterin ran with it, saying that he doesn't think the legalising the possession of child porn is more radical than heroin, and claims he can make an argument that legalisation of child porn does not impose harm on others.

This is not an analogy. This is him picking up a conversational thread by someone else, justifying why he supports Bitcoin Cash by saying he doesn't think legalising child porn is bad.

And there is no way you can misconstrue his statement that 'censorship is great' is anything but a statement in support of censorship.