RE: ICO Review of: OmiseGo

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

ICO Review of: OmiseGo

in ethereum •  7 years ago 

I agree with you that there must be some exclusivity for this platform. I will think about that. And I already have a great idea! I will make longer and deeper review of ICOs here =) In videos and medium I will post the usual stuff but here I will expand on many points. Hope, it will create that much needed additional content for the readers of Steemit

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Dear Dan.
I am writing this becasue you always ask for feedback and I really value your opinions.

First of all, I think you should be proud of the quality of the content you provide.

Second, I totally agree that your idea here, and I think that it would be good for you to put a referral to your steemit articles at the end of your videos for "those who want a deeper analysis and additional information" (but I am sure you already thought about it).

Third, you could analyse both ICOs and current projects and promoting (yes, I know you already do it, but stay with me a little longer) and promote your videos and articles in this way. You could focus in a deep analysis of those projects that have real value (in my opinion Steemit, Waves, Ethereum, etc.) and also, in a kind of debunking and / or puting some reason behind those hyped projects everybody is talking about as if they were that best of all.

Fourth, I am really very interested in knowing your opinions about the Neo/Antshares project, LBRY (library), Stratis, and Lykke (which i think is the OmiseGo of the west, with some limitation). I tracked them among your videos and posts but could not find anything. I am sure you know about them and perhaps you thought about an video, but I only mention them just in case.

Keep up the excellent work and thank you