RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus

in etheruem •  6 years ago 

"...the exact form the game state takes is irrelevant so long as all players agree on the validity of new game inputs"

From what I understood, trying to generate a canonical state doesn't make sense because all participants had already agreed with the state of the transaction in the first place when it was included in the ledger.

I would say that it makes sense if you have the ability to make the participants agree in the transaction very fast, which I assume is the case of EOS, because you basically have very few of them.
If not, making all participants agree with every transaction would take longer, that's why I assume you have to pack those transaction in a block and validate it with hashes.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!