Last week I listened to an interview. The author being interviewed was a raging pragmatist. Very utilitarian.
I found the interview disgusting for all the same reasons I always find pragmatism and utilitarianism without a foundation in ethical behavior disgusting. And it is rare to find a utilitarian pragmatist who thinks ethics are pragmatic or utilitarian... unless they happen to agree with what he wants to do to you this time.
There's literally nothing that can't be excused or justified that way. It was hard to listen to and made me feel physically sick at several points.
I understand why people preach pragmatism. There's no point in living in a fantasy world of things and ideas that can't work.
I understand utilitarianism, too. You might as well use methods that are useful.
But just because something can work or is useful doesn't mean it's right.
Genocide obviously works in the real world, and it can be perfectly useful, depending on what you want to accomplish-- as long as you don't worry yourself over whether it is wrong.
Legislation can also work in the real world and it can be useful. Never mind that using it is almost always going to be unethical. As long as your goals are more important that who you violate while getting there, you can be very pragmatic and utilitarian.
I don't really hate pragmatism or utility, although it might seem so from what I've been saying. What I hate is the way those are used to advocate and justify committing evil against others.
You don't have to be pragmatic or utilitarian to be an advocate of evil. Bernie Sanders is certainly not pragmatic or utilitarian-- although it could be argued that his theft advocacy could be utilitarian, even though it wouldn't be utilitarian enough to reach his stated goals. However, I have not yet run across a vocal advocate of pragmatism or utilitarianism who isn't also trying to excuse some sort of great evil. It must be a difficult line to walk; too difficult to navigate in the real world.
Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
I hope I add something you find valuable enough to support. If so... Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!
Find me on Patreon
♡CopyHeart 2010 by Author/Artist. Copying is an act of love. Please copy.
If you discard your principles whenever they're impractical, you're not pragmatic; you're unprincipled.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks to both my busy schedule and Steemit's lovely new interface, I didn't see this right away, but there's an interesting angle I'd like to add. Since staunch pragmatism is a "needs-based" philosophy - that nothing should exist if there's no need for it, then proponents of such a philosophy can easily be hoisted with their own petard. Pragmatism is a very popular argument for banning certain things - art, for instance. "No-one needs to see this crap," some prude will declare. Gun-grabbers use it too, because "no-one needs a 30-round magazine." Well, no-one needs electricity, if you think about it for more than a minute. No-one needs a car that can go faster than 70mph, though that "need" is, itself, based on a completely artificial speed limit. Certainly no-one needs to spend time on the internet cesspit called Twitter, and no-one needs to have a favourite colour. If you really think about it, staunch pragmatists are all a bunch of hypocrites, since, bar none, they all own and/or use things that they don't need.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No one needs to be governed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit