The theory of evolution supposes that life somehow originated and evolved in the sea until somehow something that had theretofore lived only under water grew lungs and feet and started living on land. Darwinists claim fish (creatures living only under water) turned into amphibians (creatures living on both land and water) and then amphibians evolved into reptiles (creatures living only on land).
Then they propose some reptiles evolved wings and became birds while other reptiles evolved and became mammals. None of these transitional forms have ever been found, however, nor could they realistically exist either. For example amphibian eggs develop only in water whereas amniotic eggs develop only on land, so some sort of gradual step by step evolution scenario is impossible since without perfect, complete eggs a species cannot survive. Reptiles allegedly evolving into mammals is another example of evolutionist wishful thinking. Reptiles are cold blooded, lay eggs, do not suckle their young, have one middle ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies covered in scales, whereas mammals are warm blooded, have live births, suckle their young, have three middle ear bones, one mandible, and are covered in fur or hair............ far too many distinct differences for "gradual evolution."
Reptiles evolving wings is another sheer impossibility, as the structure of land dwelling reptiles and air dwelling birds are far too different.
There is a problem that eyes and wings present to Darwin’s theory............. The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed. In other words a half way developed eye cannot see....... And a bird with half formed wings cannot fly.
How these organs came into being has remained one of the mysteries of nature that needs to be enlightened.
Darwin's theory is a concept that concerns not only biology, chemistry, astronomy and metaphysics, but actually formed the basis for new political outlooks as well.
Within a very short time, this new progressive political attitude was redefined as “Social Darwinism,” and as many historians have suggested, Social Darwinism became the ideological basis of fascism, communism, and eugenics. Darwin’s ideas of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest” were central to the insane ideologies of many of the 20th century’s worst mass murderers including Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, and Pol Pot.
Charles Darwin himself was a blatant racist who elucidated in his book “The Descent of Man” how blacks and aborigines, due to their inferiority to Caucasians would “be done away with by the civilized races in time.”
Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the fossil record. To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found anywhere in the world. Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly correct.
So called "micro evolution" of various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely exists, but "macro evolution," the supposed transformation from one species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record.
Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve: No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo Darwinism is about this question.
Freemasons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals, played a great role in its dissemination among the masses. As soon as Darwin's theory was published, a group of volunteer propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin's "bulldog." Huxley, whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism was the single factor most responsible for its rapid acceptance brought the world's attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford University Museum in which he entered into on June 30th, 1860 with the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce.
Huxley's great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his establishment connections, is brought into further light according to the following fact....... Huxley was a member of the Royal Society, one of England's most prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the other members of this institution, was a senior Mason. Other members of the Royal Society lent Darwin significant support …........ In short, Darwin wasn’t acting alone......... from the moment his theory was proposed, he received the support that came from the social classes and groups whose nucleus was made up of Freemasons.
Although Charles Darwin is known as the father of evolution,
Freemasonic records state that Charles Darwin’s grandfather Erasmus Darwin was a philosopher, scientist and physician who had ideas on evolution back in the 18th century.
Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Darwin had been made a Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning No. 2 of Scotland. He also maintained close connections to the Jacobin Masons in France and Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati. Sir Francis Darwin and Reginald Darwin, two of his sons, were also made Masons in Tyrian Lodge No. 253 at Derby.
Charles wrote that he used to listen to his grandfather’s "ideas of evolution" and was greatly influenced by them. Erasmus was the first man to put forward the notion of evolution in England. He was known as a “respected” person, but he had a very dark private and at least two illegitimate children.
Charles himself would go on to marry his first cousin and have three children die due to complications from inbreeding.
IS THE TRUTH REALLY THAT DIFFICULT TO GRASP ?
Even in the most "scientific" books about evolution, the stage of "transition from water to land", one of the unexplainable points of evolution, is given in such simplicity that they do not prove to be believable even for children.
According to evolution, life began in water and the first developed animals on earth were fish. According to the story, one day fish species developed the ability to climb out of water and moved on land.
The theory continues that fish which chose to live on land had feet instead of fins and lungs instead of gills. In most of the books about evolution, nobody explains "why" the transition occurred. Even in the most "scientific" sources, writers suddenly jump to conclusions like "and transition from water to land occurred" without providing a satisfactory answer regarding how the process worked. Yet how did this transformation occur ?
It is obvious that a fish cannot survive out of water for more than one or two minutes. If, we assume that a drought really existed as claimed by evolutionists, and fish were, for some reason, drawn to lands then what would happen to fish even if this process lasts for ten millions of years ? The answer is straight....... Fish leaving the water would inevitably die in a few moments. Even if this process lasted for ten millions of years, the answer would still be the same......... All fish would die one by one.
Nobody would dare to say, "Maybe after 4 million years some of the fish suddenly acquired lungs while they were trying to survive". This would no doubt be an illogical assertion. However that is exactly what evolutionists claim.
RECAPITULATION HOAX
One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as "recapitulation theory," and heralded as undeniable "proof of evolution," was an idea proposed and propagated by a racist eugenicist Professor named Ernst Haeckel in the late 19th century.
A contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas "Bulldog" Huxley, Haeckel postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb, displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or human.
It has long been eliminated from scientific literature, but many people and popular sources still unknowingly quote and believe in Haeckel’s fraudulent work. Several popular magazines and school textbooks as recently as the 1990s, over a century after being exposed, were still publishing Haeckel’s hoaxed pictures and recapitulation theory as science fact.
The first of these convenient evolutionary "discoveries" was the "Neanderthal Man" found in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856, just in time for the release of Darwin’s Origin of Species.
To this day, reconstructed drawings of hairy ape like "Neanderthal" men are depicted in scholarly journals and school textbooks and claimed to be a missing evolutionary link. The fact is, however, that all so called Neanderthal remains have never been shown to be any more different from modern humans than an Asian from a Caucasian, or an Inuit from an Aborigine.
Also the skull size shows its brain was actually 13% larger than the average brain of modern man, making it impossible to be an intermediary between man and ape.
Even Time magazine in 1971 proclaimed the primitiveness of Neanderthal to be unwarranted, that he could walk the street today unrecognized, one writer even commenting that historians of the future may "declare us all insane for not detecting and refuting this incredible blunder with adequate determination."
Haeckel was accused of committing fraud in order to give credibility to his theories.
He came up with a theory that considerably shaped the science of his day. He called his theory the Biogenetic Law, also known under the catchphrase..... "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny". His idea was that the development of the individual embryo, ontogeny, goes through the same stages as the history of species, phylogeny. This intricate relationship between the individual and its species would reveal the interconnectedness of all life on earth. Haeckel thought that his theory would prove that evolution actually happens, that common descent of all species is a reality.
You probably have never heard of the Biogenetic Law or obscure terms like ‘ontogeny’ or ‘phylogeny’. However, you are most likely more familiar with this theory than you might think. Probably, you actually came across it in your own high school biology textbooks.
That is because Haeckel did not only come up with the so weirdly sounding formulation of ‘ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny’, he also offered fitting visual support to his claim. And this visual support, his infamous embryo illustrations, is the reason why Haeckel has been labeled a fraud.
This illustration is supposed to show the common descent of dogs and humans. In the fourth week of embryonic development (left picture), the depicted embryos are very similar, nearly undistinguishable. The gill arch, which eventually develops into gills in fishes, is visible in early stages of development among both mammals. Furthermore, both embryos exhibit a "tailed stage". Such rudimentary organs, as gill slits or the tail, remain visible as remnants of morphologies of a species’ phylogenetic past during ontogeny. The conclusion is that man had a tailed ancestor common descent becomes undeniable. On the right side, we can see how the two embryos slowly divert in the later weeks of development. A certain degree of resemblance, even in these later stages of embryonic development, shows the connectedness of all species in the origin and history of organic life. These illustrations come with a certain rhetorical force. They convincingly show how all life on earth indeed seems to be related........
The next fraudulent attempt at creating and propagating a supposed ape-man transitional form was carried out in 1922 by Henry Fairfield Osborn. Co-founder of the American Eugenics Society, President of the White Supremacist Pioneer Fund and director of the American Museum of Natural History, Osborn declared that he had been sent an anomalous tooth found in Snake Brook, Nebraska, which had characteristics of both ape and man! He determined that it came from the Pliocene period of ancient history, from the transitional species "Pithecanthropus erectus," and affectionately labeled the tooth’s owner "Nebraska Man."
Nebraska man was also immediately given a "scientific name," Hesperopithecus haroldcooki. Many authorities gave Osborn their support. Based on this single tooth, reconstructions of the Nebraska man's head and body were drawn. Moreover, Nebraska man was even pictured along with his wife and children, as a whole family in a natural setting.
Via fb Conscious Evolution
♡
_ \ \ | / / _