Why Evolution Theory Is Unscientific, Preposterous, And A Fraud (Part One)

It's quite astonishing how ridiculous ideas become commonplace. Be it the fairy tale of dinosaurs that once roamed the lands, the ludicrousness of the heliocentric belief system, or the notion that man evolved from monkey – once you scrutinize these and other concepts, you come to realise how absurd such brainchilds really are. They are not backed up by any actual facts, only by make-believe, forgeries, circular reasoning, and circumstantial evidence at best.

The theory of evolution is being taught in schools across the plane not only as fact, but as the only explanatory model of how all beings came about. Thing is, this explanatory model is not scientifically achieved cognisance, but rather an attemped explanation based on the fundaments of a particular episteme.

Genuine science studies and categorises facts and then objectively and neutrally looks for interpretations that correspond best with the sum of the facts. But: Scientific conclusions are always based on belief, i.e. on an episteme, upon which the facts are interpreted. „Believing“ is the adoption of a certain worldview. In other words: Everybody believes!

Five aspects of evolution belief:

• The absoluteness of matter, i.e. the belief that the primal ground of every existing thing is the totality of matter and energy, which in turn relies on the assumption that the primal ground of the universe and of life is without consciousness

• The self-organisation of matter, i.e. the belief that matter forms itself according to its inherent principles – without aim and higher purpose

• The omnipotence of contingency, i.e. the belief that the whole cosmos and the earth – including all organic matter – originated from random combinations of atoms within the scope of the laws of physics and chemistry

• The genesis of life from matter (abiogenesis), i.e. the belief that organic matter originated from anorganic matter

• Macroevolution, i.e. the belief that herbal and animal multicellular organisms arose from unicellular organisms via accidental mutations

Three forms of hypothetic evolutions result from these basic assumptions:

• Physical evolution: from „big bang“ to the formation of earth (=self-organisation of matter)

• Chemical evolution: from anorganic matter to the incurrence of organic matter to the emergence of early living organisms from matter (=abiogenesis)

• Biological evolution: from early living organisms to the entire diversity of plants, animals, and human beings (=macroevolution)

The theory of abiogenesis is based on wishful thinking, and not on a scientific finding that would have pointed towards abiogenesis. If living organisms were a product of matter, it should be possible to produce a at least germinable grain in the laboratory. But it's not.

Experiments like the ones conducted by Miller and Urey don’t generate – as falsely proclaimed – „building blocks of life“ from anorganic matter, but merely building blocks of organic matter.

Whatever evolution theory claims about the emergence of species, and therefore about the origin of man, stands and falls with the foundation on which it is built upon, that is to say on the hypotheses of the materialistic worldview on the formation of the cosmos, the earth, and early living creatures. As long as it is not proven that and how the first living things came from matter, all other assertions of this theory remain unfounded.

To be continued.

This entry is a partial translation / summary of the book "Evolution – Stammt der Mensch von den Tieren ab?" by Armin Risi.