— SteemCN

RE: Why Evolution Theory Is Unscientific, Preposterous, And A Fraud (Part One)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Why Evolution Theory Is Unscientific, Preposterous, And A Fraud (Part One)

uvas (46) in evolutiontheory • 7 years ago

Wow, one guy questioning evolution. I never seen one of those before.

7 years ago by uvas (46)

$0.00

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

klevn (47) · 7 years ago

it isn't about how many, it is about what they say.

science isn't a popularity vote.

$0.00

[-]

uvas (46) · 7 years ago

So if he is so smart and educated, perhaps he should submit a peer reviewed paper and show the scientists how evolution isn't even a theory. lolz

$0.00

[-]

klevn (47) · 7 years ago

i think you fail to understand there is no peer reviewed paper for evolution that actually proves anything.

tons of conjecture, tons of theories... but no proof.

yet you demand proof against it? i don't need it, there is no proof for it. that is the point.

$0.00

[-]

uvas (46) · 7 years ago

Lol, it took three whole responses to start lying. Well done.

An extremely brief list of peer reviewed papers on evolution:

I am curious how you happen to know the contents and conclusions of thousands upon thousands of scientific and scholarly papers on evolution, and the knowledge and ability to determine that they offer no evidence of evolution. I am going to take it on good authority that you don't.

Such a liar. I am not surprised though, as this is your standard operating procedure.

$0.00

[-]

klevn (47) · 7 years ago

publishing a paper of theories does not a proof make.

hmm... what is this crap?

Expression pattern and functional analysis of the two RING box protein RBX in spermatogenesis of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis.

These results suggested that Es-RBX1 plays a key role in spermatogenesis of E. sinensis though forming a complex with Cullin4.

key word... suggests. not proof.

so you have a bunch of papers, that literally examine a tiny things and try to extrapolate them onto the larger scheme of life.

yet you have zero proof of evolution. you cannot show me a species change into another. we have never seen it happen.

i believe in spiritual evolution, that things happen in the background of life and then things come forth, whole and complete. but i know that i just a belief, I don't claim it to be truth.

yet here you are, with zero proof, calling me names, and linking me a bunch of studies that do nothing to prove evolution. they claim it points to it, they claim they have found something like what they expected, but they are still theoretical.... and very boring.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

uvas (46) · 7 years ago

I gave you a very very very small selection of a huge body of knowledge. And all you can do is to pick on one word in the abstract of one paper as if that somehow dismisses the entire body of evolutionary knowledge. Well, it doesn't. You look like a drowning man gasping for air.

Should I list some of the second page of 25,000 pages?

You, on the other hand, post bullshit as if it was truth, hoping that no one will call you out on it. And even after your lies have been exposed, you just ignore it and act like your dumb assed lies are worth examining.

I call a liar a liar, its not that big of a deal. :-) You can have the last word, I am done here. I am confident it will just be stupid bullshit anyway.

$0.00

[-]

klevn (47) · 7 years ago

theory is not proof, conjecture is not evidence.

we could have 10,000 pages on how water isn't wet, it wouldn't make it so.

but in your world, it is true.

$0.00

1 vote