RE: Exchanges: Is The Future Centralized Or Decentralized?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Exchanges: Is The Future Centralized Or Decentralized?

in exchanges •  5 years ago  (edited)

Decentralized exchanges are trustless. Therefore, they have to rely on cross-chain atomic swaps, which are radically slower than centralized exchanges particularly in the case of PoW coins. A cross-chain atomic swap involves four on-chain transactions, two on both chains. Imagine trading Bitcoin for Litecoin using atomic swaps. A single trade could take over an hour. Goodbye high transaction volume. For PoS or DPoS chains the situation is much less bad but a lot of speed is still sacrificed.

OTC trading can to scale slightly better because you need only one transaction on each chain in a trading pair but it isn't trustless.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

All valid pionts @markkujantunen.

The time of atomic swaps, especially on POW, makes it infeasible.

There is no clear "good" solution right now.

Actually, I realized I was wrong because trustless second-tier layers could enable day traders keep their trades off-chain for a day and move them on-chain at the end of the day. But I don't think the Lightning Network is ready for that, yet.