I've never seen so many articles on my crypto news feed all revolving around the same topic. There must have been 20 of them.
This was one of the better ones. Most of the articles focus on whether Bitcoin needs to worry about Project Libra or if it will actually help crypto. Others talk about how LBR isn't actually a cryptocurrency. Thankfully I was able to find at least one that actually summarized the content of the whitepaper. lol
Libra (LBR) is a cryptocurrency built on top of the Libra Blockchain. It is fully collateralized by the Libra Reserve, which is a basket of cash deposits (corresponding to several fiat currencies) and low-volatility cash-equivalent assets such as "government securities in currencies from stable and reputable central banks."
According to the official Libra white paper, initially, this will be a permissioned blockchain that uses LibraBFT, a Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus protocol, which makes it "extraordinarily difficult for an attacker to compromise 33 separately run nodes that would be required to launch an attack against the system."
At the mainnet launch, the Libra Blockchain will be secured by 100 validating nodes.
The white paper also notes that as with other major blockchains, transactions will be pseudonymous:
“Transactions do not contain links to a user’s real-world identity... This approach follows the norm of pseudonymous transactions adopted by other major blockchains. This approach is familiar to many users, developers and regulators.”
I find this interesting. They are going to try and obfuscate the public facing transnational data while personally knowing everything that is going on due to the KYC required for buying in/out. However, it makes me wonder if you could use Libra fully anonymously.
Imagine paying your friend $1000 to send you 1000 Libra. As long as you don't ever cash out any of that money to your own identity you'd remain completely anonymous.
Each member has invested at least $10 million to be part of this governing consortium.
Ben Maurer, Facebook’s blockchain technical lead, told CoinDesk that although initially only those founding members can run a validator node, Facebook is hoping that eventually node participation will be open to everyone, i.e. a lot more decentralized:
Interesting...
Each investment of $10 million gets a member one vote (no member is allowed to have more than 1% of total votes).
Users of Libra "do not receive a return from the reserve." Instead, the interest income from the funds in the Libra Reserve will be spent in two ways:
- "to support the operating expenses of the association", such as "investments in the growth and development of the ecosystem, grants to nonprofit and multilateral organizations, engineering research"; and
- "to pay dividends to early investors in the Libra Investment Token for their initial contributions."
Okay, now this is super interesting. All the INTEREST on this banked fiat pegging Libra to a stable value is going straight to investors and development.
And how do banks get the most interest from fiat reserves? Fractional reserve lending. Therefore, most of the collateral that pegs Libra's stability will exist as a secured loan that takes the form of some asset or another (car/house/etc).
At best we can likely assume that only 20% of that fiat is going to be held liquid in a bank. If a global recession strikes the economy and those secured loans don't get paid back the entire system could fail. (Assuming the value of the underlying asset's collateral deteriorates.) Hell, maybe this debt will even be issued as credit cards... which would make the entire system even more unstable.
In addition to sniping all the interest for themselves, Project Libra will also obviously monetize the datamine. They'll find spending patterns among groups of people and throw targeted advertising at them... things like that. It's no wonder why so many corporations are clamoring to be a part of this project.
Calibra is a wallet for Libra. It is available both as a standalone mobile app (which means you do not need a Facebook account) and also from within Facebook's Messenger and Whatsapp. It will allow you to send/receive money (Libra) to/from other people; top up (which means converting your local currency into Libra); and withdraw local currency (which requires conversion from your Libra to fiat).
It is these conversions that will surely have the KYC/AML rules in place. All the more reason to wonder if Libra really can be used anonymously if you never enter or exit the system using KYC.
In the future:
“Implied in this project is that wherever the Visa or Mastercard logo are accepted, Libra would follow suit. In so many ways it’s a great leap forward for cryptocurrencies and, in many respects, a mainstreaming of this asset class.”
"Calibra will not share account information or financial data with Facebook, Inc. or any third party without customer consent."
I trust you.
This is what cryptocurrency is all about: trusting the people in charge.
Disclaimer: consent is opt out by default. Trollolol.
Conclusion
This is actually an exciting project. Sure, it is the antithesis of decentralization and what we are trying to achieve. We are honor bound to hate it. However, we are also honor bound to hate fiat, central banking, corporations, governments, etc. etc. Yet, all of us still use and are affected by these centralized agencies.
Libra will not compete with the cryptosphere. It can only strengthen it. Libra is in competition with banks (and hopefully Ripple). Libra will be the ultimate form of centralized crypto with a built-in audience of BILLIONS.
This is all part of the process of finding the middle ground. Once the middle ground is discovered it will shift more and more toward decentralization because that's where the value is. Until then grab some !popcorn and enjoy the ride. It's going to be a bumpy one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Of which there are zero. Even the Swiss central bank gambles on Wall Street.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I trust you.
The tone of sacarsm really cracked me up up here beautiful write up man, and really simplified 😜. For me the discovery of masternodes (especially with the likes of $Divi or any privacy coin) is good enough for me. When libra comes up fully, i would get in on the train if there is money to be made offcorse but I sure as hell Won't get carried away. The true crypto enthusiasts know that the true value of this space lies in its decentralisation!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm glad you enjoyed it.
You can't build communal value with a stable coin.
Plain and simple.
I still find the whole situation very interesting though.
He's not trying to build communal value, but rather corporate value.
Reminds me of The Company from the Aliens movies.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I've been describing it as ETH if you backed it like USDT and ran it like XRP.
It's not really a cryptocurrency in the way we think about them as alternative currencies. It's really a blockchain payments system.
I was reading the white paper and the technical paper this morning and although the node operators will be holding the interest for themselves, there will still be gas payments.
Also if anyone is interested, I have a longer writeup on my blog.
#palnet
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I know some people think this will be the death of bitcoin, but I see it as a normalization of digital assets. When it becomes common sense that digital assets are real, and not some thing nerds do, more will come flocking to Bitcoin.
I suspect I will use libra here and there too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It might turn out to be the best fiat<->crypto gateway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
LIBRA is:
Nothing more than old bad FIAT, only just in another digital shape.
How it is even possible to call it "a cryptocurrency" ???
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What I'm starting to realize is that blockchain is actually useful for Libra. They wouldn't have just been able to make it with a regular database like people are saying.
In order for Libra to get hacked, 33 of the 100 corporations (nodes) involved would have to get hacked at the same time. Seems very impossible.
This shows that Libra is decentrazlied... but only in the context of slightly decentralizing the top megacorps of the world and uniting them around a single digital currency.
Make no mistake, they will eventually take the fiat peg away from their coin (probably during a financial crisis) and have their very own central bank coin pegged to the value of itself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I’m pretty sure this project will take off there are way to many normies using Facebook who don’t know or care about how the value is moved around they just want to buy more shit!
We can only hope this will have a knock on effect in crypto by creating awareness! Somehow I think fb will censor the shit out of content that goes against Libra and Libra alternatives
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If there is money to be made I will use it. It still puzzles me though on many levels as to how they will get away with it.
The anonymous part of it makes me think it wont ever pass SEC and Government in which Facebook is currently located in.
The other part is it has to be a stable coin no matter how much they try and tell us it is not. No companies such as Facebook, Visa, Mastercard etc are going to risk losing all of their FIAT money to a cryptocurrency.
Still a lot of unanswered questions for me and gray areas.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So much to like in that one observation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The reception of #Libra has been perturbed by Facebook’s past, and rightfully so. From the corporation that has sold out user privacy, Facebook now offers you a bank account without interest rates, insurance, or oversight. There are no term limits on who runs Libra. You can’t vote out Mark Zuckerberg for screwing up monetary policy.
Of course, this does show a mass movement towards blockchain enabled services, #Facebook wants in but let’s not give it to them and respect the community. #Blockchain is creating its own success and does not need a platform in decline to back that up. Facebook is just grasping at straws when it comes to its new developments and ripping off well-known services that already exist, watch out - patent everything.
Firstly, after reviewing it’s whitepaper, I saw that it has a similarity to another project I’m following. Element Zero foundation is a not-for-profit organization with a #stablecoin that completes removes volatility. The Element Zero protocol is live and did not take Visa and Uber (two main blockchain value violators) to give $10M to complete.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that most of the world is greatly overestimating how much power Facebook and Zuckerburg are actually going to have regarding project Libra.
Everyone just assumes that because Facebook and Zuckerburg are creating the thing that they will control it. That's not going to happen. There's a reason it's being set up like it is. All 100 corporations are going to have a little control. This will make it way way harder for banks/governments/regulators to attack it.
It actually looks like it's going to be decentralized from a corporate point of view... I think it's going to surprise everyone and be quite the spectacle.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fascinating article. Thank you. I write an article in this coin myself. But I am still reading everything I can to better understand this complicated addition to a complicated financial niche the cryptosphere. Now we have this complicated hybrid which initially looked like a bridge but now looks like a siphon or threat to existing central banks by potentially getting billions of people into crypto suddenly. Something Bitcoin hasn’t completely done and potentially hurting the banking system or forcing it to evolve. Mind blown.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit