The first post that I made about Parentalrights.org I told you about the proposed Parental Rights Amendment!
"The proposed Parental Rights Amendment will specifically add parental rights in the text of the U.S. Constitution, protecting these rights for both current and future generations."
Previously the right of the parent was established in court cases and there was no need for such an amendment.
Ninety years ago the Supreme Court declared that
“the child is not the mere creature of the State; those
who nurture him and direct his destiny have the
right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and
prepare him for additional obligations.” Pierce v.
Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
This line of reasoning was continued by the Court in the case Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).
This was the pronouncement in that case that the:
primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.
Unfortunately that debate was re-opened in 2000.
When the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed the law in Troxel v. Granville (2000), a Washington state undermined parental rights by this finding:
It was stated that a good parent's decision about visitation rights can be overridden by a third party simply by claiming it would be in the "best" interest of the child.
There were six separate opinions and none reached a five-vote majority.
- Justice Scalia held that parents have no
constitutionally protected rights whatsoever.- Only Justice Thomas clearly stated that parental
rights receive the same high legal standard of
protection as other fundamental rights
This court decision seriously undermined the support for a high-view of parental rights.
This decision caused that several federal courts:
refuse to treat parental rights as deserving of protection as a fundamental right.
So that is why this Amendment is so urgent and so very important.
THE GOOD NEWS!!!
This is actually the reason why I started to made this post. Parentalrights.org engaged at a special Lobbying day at the Capitol on 27 June 2018.
From Wednesday 27 June - 29 June 2018, Parental rights.org visited D.C. to speak to Congress on your behalf, urging their support for the Parental Rights Amendment. If there is one thing that all Americans should agree on is that children should not be separated from their parents unless that child is in real danger. That was the message that parentalrights.org took to Capitol Hill.
The good news is that a new co-sponsor came onboard and the number of co-sponsors reached 21!!!
Ken Calvert (CA-42) is now a cosponsor of H.J. Res. 121, the Parental Rights Amendment, in the U.S. House. With lead sponsor Randy Hultgren (IL-14), Calvert brings to 21 the total number of supporters in that chamber.
Parentalrights says that Congress has been very busy as always and it took Rep. Calvert a whole three weeks to sign on. So they are very hopeful that other members may also sign on soon as they maybe just haven't found the time to do so yet!!! Every co-sponsor that signs on is a breakthrough in the fight to get this Amendment through.
Thank you for your support of Parentalrights.org!!!!
Please support the important work of ParentalRights.org Go look at their page how you can help.
https://parentalrights.org/get_involved/
Also, support this community of Family Protection here on steemit!
Donations can be made directly to the wallet of @familyprotection.
If you are not familiar with @familyprotection, you can read about them here:
https://steemit.com/introducemyself/@familyprotection/we-are-family-protection-keeping-families-safe-together
Thank you for reading!!!
Source: www.parentalrights.org
Images: www.parentalrights.org
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@familyprotection has been chosen to receive another donation of 12 SBD from the A Dollar A Day project - supported today by @pennsif, @cecicastor, @cryptocurator, @globocop, @goldendawne, @jasminearch, @lyndsaybowes & witnesses @quochuy, @steemcommunity & @yabapmatt
Contact @pennsif if you would like to know more about A Dollar A Day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Greetings @hope777! Your post was randomly chosen and was resteemed because you are one of our followers. Enjoy your free resteem!
Shareables - We resteem anything we find shareable. Always strive for quality content. Go on express and harness your blogging potential!
God bless from us @Shareables!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 10
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
unquestionably friend, I am in agreement with you, as we investigate the issue of cps we can learn about them and the things they are able to do to benefit, sincerely personally I am increasingly surprised how far they are able to get these people, and the injustice and harm they cause to children. Thanks for sharing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for showing where some of the defining moments happened on this slippery slope. It is important to know these things, as well as those responsible for pushing these horrible laws onto us.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your comments. I also learn these things as I dig deeper into the subject.
Before I opened this post I was just thinking I wonder how many South African's live in total poverty. I googled the figure:
So half the population of South Africa would lose their children as some of these families struggle to give one filling (not necessarily nutrious) meal a day. Lots of schools have feeding schemes to provide just that one meal a day. The poverty stricken parents just do the best they can but does not mean that they do not love and care for their children. The social services in South Africa would only intervene in real cases of child neglect (like leaving small kids at home alone) and child abuse. (physical and sexual).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post was upvoted and resteemed by #thethreehugs. Thank you for your support of @familyprotection.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit