As you may know, I am a promoter of Switzerland as a Crypto Hub, after all, I live here, and I support the latest government decisions strongly concerning the Blockchain and Cryptospace.

Today the FINMA (Swiss Financial Markets Supervisory Authority) released the result of its last roundtable on the subject.
I will make an overview of it and leave a link so you can also download the document. Maybe one of you dear readers is involved in the Cryptospace as an entrepreneur and is considering Switzerland as a location for your new endeavor.

Switzerland was and still is somehow one of the biggest and most reputed financial markets worldwide. Swiss Banking is famous for its Chocolate, Cheeses and Mountains and their ski-resorts. The first industry is suffering a substantial hit after U.S. enforced almost unilaterally the new FATCA tax rules, which triggered world transparency and anti-tax-haven worldwide movement. Switzerland lost a considerable amount of Market and is now seizing opportunities in the fintech sector, and most recently in the Blockchain one.

The FINMA set some strategic goals a few years ago in preparation for a disruptive market.

Goal 5
-No unnecessary obstacles to innovative business models
-Principle-based, technology-neutral and competition-neutral regulation and supervision
-Transparent and legal clarity
-Zero tolerance of criminal behaviour

As you can see, that is quite a difference with other developed countries. The FINMA is not alone in this path, and it is actively participating in the 2018 Federal Working Group on innovative technologies, it is expected that the Federal govt. will pass some law to promote the sector sometime this year.

As seen in a previous post of mine the FINMA is the one responsible for releasing the Token type qualification. To quote the report;

Token categories

– Payment tokens: (cryptocurrencies) give rise to no claims on their issuer. They are
intended to be used, now or in the future, as a means of payment for acquiring
goods or services or as a means of money or value transfer.

– Asset tokens: represent assets such as a debt, equity or other claim on the issuer,
e.g. a share in future company earnings or capital flows. In terms of their economic
function, these tokens are analogous to equities, bonds or derivatives. Tokens
which enable physical assets to be traded on the blockchain also fall into this
category.

– Utility tokens: provide access digitally to an application or service by means of a
blockchain-based infrastructure at the point of issue.

(Author bold highlight)

Starting from there is much more comfortable for an ICO start-up to decide which option to adopt, and moreover what kind of regulation will impact the tokens and future users and investors. As expected, when qualifying as Securities, the harder the controls and regulations will be.

The innovative take comes, when referring to Securities Tokens, states that they can be uncertificated and the only requisite is for the issuer to keep a ledger on the amount and type of these, and adds;

"There are no requirements as to the form of the uncertificated securities ledger. It can be kept on a
blockchain."

As far as I know, this opens a new field for Tokens as securities, since one of the biggest fears in the market is to be considered a Security and therefore complying with the strict securities laws. One of the worst issues is to keep track of the holders and the need to operate through the centralized ledger and safe-keeping intermediaries, also known as "stock exchanges".
The last would mean an impossible for such small companies and start-ups and would've meant an early killer for the system.

A practical graphic has been created by the FINMA to follow and decide what kind of Token is being built;

Snaps belong to the report and are made by FINMA

@Santana33
CryptoProphet Blockchain Evangelist - Blogger website: https://steemit.com/@santana33 "I believe Blockchain technology will bring a new era of wealth, justice and transparency to mankind"