Yes .... it happens at the moment thats why we are discussing what changes to make isn't it? What kind of point is that?? It happens now so it can't be referred to as ridiculous or ever changed?
Again (sigh) someone starting a fake account and copying and pasting would not fair well in the mechanisms of a free market your actually making my point for me?
If you had one equal vote your saying everyone will vote for "one liner" and "copy and paste" posts??? Im saying the complete opposite the reason things like that are on here is because we have a huge problem with the curation of content in the hands of the few. Leave the judgement of good content to all users, yes even ones you personally dont like. I believe they call that equality.
"do we give them the whale vote?" what difference would it make if they cant upvote their own content? Plus my idea for a "whale vote" as your putting it is just a slightly graded system of voting not some enormous power like it is now. its the difference between upvoting 20 cents rather than 10 and is equal for all
I've enjoyed this discussion but as you continue making points that its pretty clear i've already covered I say we agree to disagree. Lets see how it works out in the future hopefully common sense will prevail
I don't think at any point you suggested that they wouldn't be able to upvote their own post.
You say that you're arguing for a free market but insist on restrictions.
You didn't outline the parameters for the 'whale vote' previously.
Look, when the facts change I change my mind. We're already seeing changes made to the voting system and I anticipate that we'll see more to come. I'm looking forward to seeing the future of Steemit and there is no definitive right or wrong way of doing things.
Yes, let's agree to disagree.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit