RE: Flagging is not censorship

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Flagging is not censorship

in flags •  7 years ago 

It is manually curated to avoid duplicates

So it is copypasta.

Why not spend a few more seconds to write something unique? Where is your voice in this effort?

If the only effort is remembering if you pasted the link before then it is not really what I would call adding value.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I have other accounts for adding original thoughts, sharing news, doing memes, novelty bots, publishing data. This account shares movie trailers which is something that happens on social media. You are plain wrong about the zero value assertion. Some people enjoy it I'm sorry if that some how doesn't fit with your vision of reality but it's true.

This account shares movie trailers

And how are you adding anything to Steemit by doing that? What is your unique contribution?

something that happens on social media

Steemit is not twitter or Reddit. Those communities do not pay you out of a reward pool for your contributions and added value. Check that FAQ that I shared.

some how doesn't fit with your vision

It doesn't fit STINC vision.

Regardless, you are not being "censored", you are being downvoted. To use your words,
"something that happens on social media"

Seriously dude scroll up I've answered that question twice now. The existence of central repository for movie trailers is unique.

Steemit is inspired by those other social networks and so using it as such only naturally follows. I'm not sure what bringing up Steem's value proposition over competitors has to do with your point though.

The fact is some people watch the videos and upvote the posts. That falsifies your zero value added to the platform. All it takes is a single upvote to objectively say value was added for someone that deemed it such.

The existence of central repository for movie trailers is unique

Google movie trailers. How are you unique? Name one thing you do extra/better than any of the other central repositories of movie trailers?

You have put way more effort into these comments defending yourself, why not channel that energy into contributing?

All it takes is a single upvote

I would agree if it was not for the fact there are so many automated and sock puppet upvotes and comments.

I'm talking about legit people leaving comments and/or upvoting. Not just socks and bots. I'm glad we can agree there is some value added then.

Sigh you do you. Just don't complain when people point out how laughably bad your content is and flag it down when you clearly have the capability to actually make it worthwhile, you just choose not to.

I have other accounts for other things. That one is for movie trailers hence the name @movietrailers. I will rightfully complain when he auto spams false accusations on every post and censors the account. That's pretty much all I can do about it.