RE: The Flat Earth Resurgence and Easy Disproofs Using Observable Reality

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The Flat Earth Resurgence and Easy Disproofs Using Observable Reality

in flatearth •  7 years ago 

LMAO @kerriknox , so you disregard all the buildings and obstructions of that area , and claiming that is going over a curve LMAO , indoctrination is deep in you ma'am

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

LOL. YOU said that there are buildings there. I completely agree. Yet all that is seen is a plane disappearing beneath a smooth horizon. No buildings. No trees. No jagged horizon. No lights from the airport or the buildings in front of the airport. Where are these buildings you say are NOT behind the curve? Go ahead and point them out to me on the video with a screenshot.

You guys always say, "Where's the curvature?" then you pull out the curvature calculator. And when we show you things behind the curvature, exactly as the curvature calculator predicts, you STILL say there is no curvature!!!

Denial or reality does not change reality. The fact is that the airplane disappearing behind the horizon matches exactly what we'd expect on a globe, and does not match what we'd expect on a flat earth.

The airport and the buildings and trees are BELOW the horizon of a lake that is at 12 foot of elevation. The earth is a sphere, and anyone can see that easily themselves with thousands of simple observations.

your delusional , i show the inconsistency of your own indoctrination , thats why i can ask u where is the curve with your own curve calculator , you cant seem to grasp an idea that would destoy your petty dreams , with all this dumb science u globe tard utilitze , the best thing you all could do is put a car in low orbit LMAO , you can argue non sensical ideas all you like. put your own maths to the test instead of regurgatating , your knowledge only good enough for your first 9/5

I already showed you the curve.. several times. Like the plane that you hate so much. The math is right in the article you obviously ignored because it doesn't confirm your bias. In fact, I have the curvature math in at least 3 articles on my blog.

That you deny it or ignore it is not 'inconsistency' on my part , but simple inability to see reality on your part.

I guess the plane is just landing at that underwater base beneath Lake Ponchartrain the government keeps to hide the shape of the earth from you and just make it LOOK like the plane is landing beneath the horizon!

I'm still waiting for your comprehensive predictive model. But... you don't have one and you never will. Because the earth is not flat and all you can do is play make believe.

If the earth were flat, you'd simply be overwhelming me with your evidence and your predictive model, but instead all you can do is deny and cry fake.

That's because the earth is not flat and you have nothing. It's a sphere. Get over it.

Or, you could just PROVE it's flat instead of continuing to use the cult tactic of ridiculously declaring victory without having proven anything.

Oh, never mind, you can't prove it. All you can do is to use cult tactics and play make believe! That might lure some of the gullible into your cult... but not anyone intelligent.

Good luck with recruiting for your cult.