Hive is more like Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin Gold (BTG): A new chain with a copy of all assets.
Hive is absolutely how forks are handled traditionally.
Of course none of those forks removed assets from accounts. That was a mistake.
The only change to the bitcoin spin offs happened after the respective fork of each version. Past history was not changed. Even Etherium's fork, which removed a transaction, did so by rolling back the clock to before a certain smart contract was created which unintentionally froze Kazillions of tokens.
There was a blacklist in the HIVE forks resyncing code that specifically removed assets of targeted accounts. Your comparison is odious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Was my last sentence not clear enough? And what part of “That was a mistake.” didn't convey my opposition to the black list?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Perhaps my reading stopped at, "Hive is absolutely how forks are handled traditionally."
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One does not exclude the other: The itself fork handled traditionally. Applying a black list as first step of the new chain was a mistake.
I had a quick peek at the source code and I'm pretty sure that's how it was done: Traditional fork and then clean out the accounts from a hard coded black list.
Now both chains have deprived users of funds. How can we ever trust them again?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit