i just dont think that HE is the reason that 43 percent of the post payout was returned. Thats about 5 steem payout i doubt his miniscule account can be causing millions in losses across the board but if thats what you think then this blockchain needs a new fork, becuase thats a very easy way to esentially destroy someones earnings. why not do it with 1000 accounts put 1 steem on each and just shut the entire network down.
RE: Terrorists, homegrown and hearing voices.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Terrorists, homegrown and hearing voices.
** as my understanding hes losing his own curation???
How is the reward pool split between authors and curators?
Up to 50% of a post's payout is awarded to curators (the people who upvoted the post) as a reward for discovering the content. The other 50% is awarded to the author.
If curators vote for a post within the first 5 minutes of it being created, a portion of their curation reward remains in the rewards pool for other authors/curators. This portion is linear to the age of the post between 0 and 5 minutes. As an example: upvoting at two minutes will donate 60% of your potential curation reward back to the rewards pool.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit