Should American Citizens be Disarmed

The United States Constitution guarantees the right not only to own a gun but the right to own and bear arms.

The actual wording of the 2nd Amendment refers specifically to the right of the people to bear arms and also says "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed. The wording actually provides for the right of the people alone, not the government or state or militia. It is the right of the people to bear arms and to constitute a militia. The government, militia and state have no rights whatsoever. The people's rights are protected by the state, militia and government, according to the will of the people and never contrary to the will of the people.

The term militia in the context of the writing of the constitution meant all illegible men of appropriate age. The term state meant the country and the idea behind the 2nd amendment's wording was to ensure that the government was never capable of exercising tyrannical rule as the people were protected by their right to bear arms, organise militia and remove tyrannical elements from government.

The right of US citizens to remove tyrannical elements from government is what is under attack and has been for many decades. The plan to ban guns was laid out in the sixties and government has never stopped working toward the goal of protecting those in power from the will of the people.

Other rights of the people, designed to protect them and the nation from despotic rule include the right to gather and to petition the government and freedom of speech both of which have been undermined, denied and legislated against.

If the clause about gun control were to fall into disfavor among the people, which it certainly has not in terms of the majority, then the people can change the constitution through utilizing their trusty servants, the government, to effect the change.

Gun control is not a realistic means of reducing crime or protecting the people and this idea has been punted by those intent on protecting the government from the people by ensuring that only the government have the weapons, all the weapons.

Studies have shown that arms bans only result in more arms on the black market, more arms in the hands of criminals and more power in the hands of governments to suppress the rights of the people.

The truth of the matter is that their are very wealthy people who feel that their success should afford them greater rights than the rest of us. They believe that mankind is heading toward disaster since it will not curb population expansion and the myriad of conflicting ideas about how to proceed in ensuring the future of the planet are in conflict and therefore doomed to failure.

Their idea is therefore, to gain control of the planet through achieving a World Government, disarming the people, culling 95 % of humanity and using the rest as slave labor in order to generate the wealth required to ensure their, the elite, longevity and the future of the planet.

These people control the governments of this planet through debt and currency manipulation, the control of banking , military operations, the media and food and water. Privatizing water supply, patenting genetically modified food and eliminating naturally occurring food supplies and means of pollination (bees), at least until their goals are met, and spreading highly contagious and infectious killer diseases along with limited nuclear war are some of the methods they employ in their strategy.

911, ISIS, Al Qaeda, destabilization of all South American countries, Asian countries, African countries and many European countries is part of the plan to force a One World Government on the people.

These plans have been around for a very long time and those who expose them are silenced or ridiculed.

Attrubution :
The Naked Capitalist (Cleon Skouzen)
The Naked Communist (Cleon Skousen)
Is Gun Ownership a Right?
Google Images
The US Constitution