RE: How To Make Your Court Case Irrelevant - Introducing Steemin' Marc Stevens' 'No State Project'.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

How To Make Your Court Case Irrelevant - Introducing Steemin' Marc Stevens' 'No State Project'.

in freedom •  7 years ago 

So the guy whose moral code is might makes right is calling me a snake oil salesman? Wow, call into a live broadcast http://marcstevens.net. And nice strawman, I don't claim society doesn't exist, citizens and states don't.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I didn't say might has right. "Conquest" is how our title to our property Is made legitimate and defended against the claims of others including against those whose lands were Taken and sold off to me and you. It's neither right nor wrong.

But if you have to live in a world of right and wrong, you're wrong for attempting to convince people their government is illegitimate because they didn't personally choose it.

I don't have the oratory talents that you have. So not going to subject myself to any verbal abuse. But make no mistake, our government doesn't rely on our individual consent but it does do so collectively. Or was supposed to. I'm not claiming our government is perfect and certain things need to be put back into balance again, namely the resident : representative Ratio needs to be increased back to 1:30,000 using modern technology, it can happen again.

https://steemit.com/anarchy/@adconner/jurisdiction-where-does-it-come-from

I verbally abuse people on my radio show? You have any proof of that? I have been accused of abusing my audience by not cutting calls soon enough, but not abusing my callers.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

That's Wasn't an accusation of past abuse. But I see that you like to ask questions. I have a two Part question for you.

  1. Do you believe in owning private land? If so, where do you trace your title for it if you have one or do you defend it by yourself?

I don't think Marc should answer that question because he doesn't want you firing giant pink unicorns at his house and killing him. Obviously, I'm not saying you've done it before ;)

I wasn't asking for his address. And I don't think he's too worried about pink unicorns even if they are giants but you've prolly got one chained in your basement extracting balance juice for your nutrimedicals biz. Hahahahaha.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Moral Code is a function of the Law. Period. And is just as much of a fiction as the law itself.

But that doesn't mean either one are illegitimate.

The Legitimacy of the US government does not rest in our consent but in its ability to defend itself, the fealty of its soldiers to the fiction of the rule of law rather than a Monarch and its recognition of and by other nations who do business with it as a sovereign entity. Otherwise the Native Americans have the legitimacy of government as the original occupiers. But the world's other recognized sovereigns - recognize the US Republic as the Legitimate Sovereign Jurisdiction over the lands it claims.

Research "Conquest" in Black's Law and International Law.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

..... if I accused you of saying society doesn't exist then I stand corrected. The State And its Citizens exist because of the fealty professed by its soldiers. For without it we have no legitimate title to our property and Law is the ficticious moral code we live by.