When you draw or paint a tree, you do not imitate the tree; you do not copy it exactly as it is, which would be mere photography. To be free to paint a tree or a flower or a sunset, you have to feel what it conveys to you: the significance, the meaning of it. Jiddu Krishnamurti
A lot of people write something and think it is pure. When in fact it is tainted with the slur of deception. It becomes a lie immediately when the context is slanted to say the same thing but posted in a different direction.
If I wrote "East" and you wrote "West" is that original? Does the balance of prose become any less an infringement when it is demised in a mere change of copy sense? Do you consider it a copyrightable text when it is nothing more than plagiarism of another's discourse migrated to another form but relating the very same opine?
Is using large words or miffing a phrase with padded verbiage a copy or an original?
Think about it.
This makes alot of sense to me. Definitely something to think about. Some will call it an evolution of text. Well, most importantly what you have written above is 100% original. Great job.
I am here also to deliver the next prompt to you.
https://steemit.com/freewrite/@mariannewest/day-267-5-minute-freewrite-friday-prompt-wildflower
Or, straight away come here to recommend your favourite freewrite poem and give yourself a chance to win one SBI. Click on the photo below and you will reach there immediately 😁.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit