Just a heads up, what is about to follow is going to mess with your head. It’s meant to. I’m kinda sorry about it, kinda not. It all started with a contest entry late last night -or was it early this morning? (LINK:https://steemit.com/contest/@bunnypuncher/tell-bunnypuncher-a-secret-contest-and-win-sbd) Eh, details. On with the fuddling of brain matter. (you were warned!)
The great debate; how much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood. The short answer is that a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could; if that woodchuck could in fact chuck wood. But, can they?
Why would we need to care if a woodchuck even wants to chuck wood? Well, if a woodchuck wanted to chuck wood, they would do so because chucking wood is what they would want to do. If a woodchuck didn’t chuck wood, what would they chuck? Would they be called woodchucks if they couldn’t chuck wood?
Supposing that a woodchuck never chucked wood. What would we call a non woodchucking woodchuck?
Feel free to reply with your answer or theory. This is not a contest, just a coffee starved brain trying to settle a silly tongue twister.
I think you have overthought this a lot :P
It sounds confusing to say is the main reason, they don't chuck wood though.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ya, imagine my mind if it were lost, and left on it's own. Without any coffee. I'd be doomed for sure.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit