To See or Not To See

A lot of top physicists, engineers, and architects have been brought together to cement/support the official accounting of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11.
They’ve made multiple presentations using mathematical equations to support their claims on behalf of their paymasters.

Equally, probably more thoroughly have been the presentations made on behalf of 9/11 proof and many other truth groups including, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
As big an event as this was, it is still a micro to the macro, a speck amongst many that has made up a synthetic creation of control.

Much of the population was initially locked into the official version/accounting of these events as they unfolded and after the fact, for many years.

But as time has gone by, the evolution of human consciousness has eroded the shroud, not so much the arguing between factions, but the events that have occurred before and since that day. The picture has continued to be painted by the ‘architects’ of our reality in such a way that it has forced the truth into view.

Not only of 9/11, because as terrible as that day was, it pales in comparison to the canvas that has been used over the last centuries, a scrim that has obscured and thwarted real human growth since its inception. And the process of its removal is ongoing, it’s a positive erosion of a negative program that has roots around all we know.

But, I believe its demise will be much quicker, because it’s as simple as letting go. The ego tells us what’s right/wrong according to its ‘learned’ dictates. But the truth just sits there like it always has. Right and wrong is a program, it’s a handle attached to our minds so we can be placed in identifiable boxes for categorizing and labeling.
Such is the political program, a left/right/wrong/right paradigm, a double ended screw, a nail with two heads, two points, no purpose at all accept to polarize and inhibit.

These are my observations based on my lack of mathematical knowledge, but using a road map of ‘past performance efficacy’ as my guide.